<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
 <title>TresSugar</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com</link>
 <description>Smart. Sexy. Fun. </description>
 <language>en</language>
 <atom:link href="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/mr.+inappropriate/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
 <title>Mr. Inappropriate</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/1558855</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/1558855&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=118  src=&#039;http://media.onsugar.com/files/upl1/1/13254/16_2008/Picture 10.large.jpg&#039;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;What better way to prepare for your week back at the office than by watching a video about that one person (in this case, a dude) who doesn&#039;t quite understand the words &quot;appropriate&quot; and &quot;boundaries.&quot; (I know, I know, it&#039;s no &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gigglesugar.com/tag/happy+caturday&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Happy Caturday.&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/nsZhd5aswmw&amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/nsZhd5aswmw&amp;hl=en&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/1558855#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Humor">Humor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Video Humor">Video Humor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Office Humor">Office Humor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/mr. inappropriate">mr. inappropriate</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/1558855</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The &quot;McCain Affair&quot; - Is The New York Times in The Wrong?</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/1060921</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/1060921&quot;&gt;&lt;img  src=&#039;http://media.onsugar.com/files/upl0/10/104169/08_2008/79845830.large.jpg&#039;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;This morning&#039;s huge story in the &lt;b&gt;New York Times&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?scp=4&amp;amp;sq=mccain+lobbyist+iseman&amp;amp;st=nyt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;raises suspicions&lt;/a&gt; of an inappropriate relationship between John McCain and a lobbyist named Vicki Iseman. McCain has already given a stern and measured denial at a press conference in Ohio. However, rather than the content of the story, it&#039;s the piece itself that seems to be the subject of scrutiny. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The piece raises the idea of the relationship, which allegedly surfaced eight years ago, and the controversy stems from the seeming lack of proof or real story. The extent of the affair seems to be this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, visiting his offices and accompanying him on a client’s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself - instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A short paragraph later the piece admits:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Mr. McCain, 71, and the lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, 40, both say they never had a romantic relationship.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reaction to the piece has been focused on whether an unnamed source reporting that McCain&#039;s campaign staff had decided to lessen Iseman&#039;s presence, and the fact that both parties had categorically dismissed the story, makes it real news. In addition, the release of the story the day after McCain had used the word &quot;nominee&quot; raises questions of a possible smear tactic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think? Is there more to the story we don&#039;t know yet? Is the real problem that the woman was a lobbyist, whether or not there was a sexual component? Is the presence of suspicion of an affair damaging to a candidate who holds his integrity up as his identity? Was the &lt;b&gt;Times&lt;/b&gt; grasping at straws?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;form action=&quot;/1060921&quot;  method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;poll&quot;&gt;  &lt;div class=&quot;vote-form&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;choices&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;The &amp;quot;McCain Affair&amp;quot; - Is The New York Times in The Wrong?&lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-0-1060921&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-0-1060921&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;0-1060921&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Yes! The Times has no story, and running these rumors now is a huge smear tactic.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-1-1060921&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-1-1060921&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;1-1060921&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; No. We deserve to know the details they have so we can decide for ourselves.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-2-1060921&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-2-1060921&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;2-1060921&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Maybe. The affair isn&#039;t huge, but it names a woman - a lobbyist! I want to know more.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-3-1060921&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-3-1060921&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;3-1060921&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Other.  I&#039;ll tell you in the comments.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[nid]&quot; id=&quot;edit-nid&quot; value=&quot;1060921&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;span class=&#039;button&#039;&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;input class=&#039;fancybutton&#039; type=&#039;submit&#039; name=&quot;op&quot; value=&quot;Vote&quot;  class=&quot;form-submit&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_id]&quot; id=&quot;edit-form_id&quot; value=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/1060921#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/John McCain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Poll">Poll</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Citizen Poll">Citizen Poll</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Vicki Iseman">Vicki Iseman</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/1060921</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
