<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
 <title>TresSugar</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
 <atom:link href="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/constitution/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
 <copyright>Copyright 1976-2012 Sugar Inc.  All rights reserved.</copyright>
 
<item>
 <title>FL Judge: Droopy Drawers Are a Constitutional Right</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/Florida-Judge-Rules-Ban-Baggy-Pants-Unconstitutional-3075050</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/Florida-Judge-Rules-Ban-Baggy-Pants-Unconstitutional-3075050&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=111  src=&#039;http://media2.onsugar.com/files/upl2/42/423748/17_2009/64b01cb62cb40c96_86187715.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;In 2008, 72 percent of voters  in Riviera Beach, FL, passed a ban on pants that ride below the waist exposing skin or underwear. But wait: turns out loose waistbands are a civil liberty. A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsmax.com/us/baggy_pants_ban/2009/04/23/206767.html&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.newsmax.com/us/baggy_pants_ban/2009/04/23/206767.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;judge ruled this week&lt;/a&gt; that the ordinance violated the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;14th amendment of the constitution&lt;/a&gt;, because there was no legitimate government interest in the law regulating style. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The city argued that the ban on saggy pants wasn&#039;t based on sartorial concerns, but safety concerns, since residents could hide weapons in their loose-fitting clothes. The judge didn&#039;t buy that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Police in various states around the country have cracked down on baggy pants. In Flint, MI, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/1743338&quot; &gt;new chief announced last year&lt;/a&gt; that he would begin arresting people with droopy drawers for indecency and make offenders face a $500 fine and up to three months in jail. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to the judge in Florida, the laws have raised the concerns of the ACLU and the NAACP, which worry about the racial implications. They think the baggy ban has the potential to disproportionately target the black community. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&#039;font-size:10px !important;&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gettyimages.com&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;gettyimages.com&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/Florida-Judge-Rules-Ban-Baggy-Pants-Unconstitutional-3075050#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/race">race</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/constitution">constitution</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Law">Law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/florida">florida</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/baggy pants">baggy pants</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>TresSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/Florida-Judge-Rules-Ban-Baggy-Pants-Unconstitutional-3075050</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Two Out of Three Americans Living in Constitution-Free Zone</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/Two-Out-Three-Americans-Living-Constitution-Free-Zone-2421543</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/Two-Out-Three-Americans-Living-Constitution-Free-Zone-2421543&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=119  src=&#039;http://media2.onsugar.com/files/upl1/16/162306/43_2008/fc0da9a8b3f35e5d_aclu.large_0.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Welcome to the border - where anyone can be stopped and searched. It used to be just the point of entry along Canada and Mexico, but Homeland Security has taken an increasingly loose - or wide - interpretation of it. Now? It&#039;s a 100-mile radius that wraps around the border of the United States.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh yes. It’s called &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.aclu.org/2008/10/22/homeland-security-assuming-broad-powers-turning-vast-swaths-of-us-into-constitution-free-zone/&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;blog.aclu.org/2008/10/22/homeland-security-assuming-broad-powers-turning-vast-swaths-of-us-into-constitution-free-zone/&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the Constitution-Free Zone&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/10/aclu-assails-10.html&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/10/aclu-assails-10.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the ACLU&lt;/a&gt;. The concern is that it erodes the rights of the Fourth Amendment - the one that protects against unreasonable searches and seizes - for two-thirds of Americans. That&#039;s 197.4 million people, and pretty much all of New England.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Authority that the Constitution would have prohibited can now be exercised by the US Customs and Border Protection. It’s been setting up inland checkpoints where it typically questions citizenship; however, people have reported extended questioning and increased pressure to permit searches. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many are calling for congress to investigate and pass new laws to protect Americans before things go too far. Do you fear it will? Or are you glad to see a protective barrier ringing the country regardless? &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/Two-Out-Three-Americans-Living-Constitution-Free-Zone-2421543#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/constitution">constitution</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Department of Homeland Security">Department of Homeland Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/ACLU">ACLU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Constitution-Free Zone">Constitution-Free Zone</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:00:50 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/Two-Out-Three-Americans-Living-Constitution-Free-Zone-2421543</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Decider Says He Doesn&#039;t Have to Follow Certain Laws </title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/Decider-Says-He-Doesnt-Have-Follow-Certain-Laws-2370193</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/Decider-Says-He-Doesnt-Have-Follow-Certain-Laws-2370193&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=112  src=&#039;http://media2.onsugar.com/files/upl1/19/193328/42_2008/Bush-Signing-Statements.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;After signing two bills into law this week, President Bush said that he could &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/15/washington/15signing.html?ref=washington&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.nytimes.com/2008/10/15/washington/15signing.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;bypass numerous parts of the laws&lt;/a&gt;. In a signing statement Bush said a military authorization act and a measure giving inspectors general greater independence from the White House unlawfully constrained the president&#039;s constitutional powers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So which parts will Bush ignore?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A section forbidding money from being used &quot;to exercise United States control of the oil resources of Iraq.&quot;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A section requiring negotiations for an agreement by which Iraq would share some of the costs of the American military operation.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Two sections strengthening legal protections against political interference with internal watchdog officials at executive agencies.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The past 42 presidents have issued 600 signing statements &lt;i&gt;combined&lt;/i&gt; while Bush himself has put out 1,100. Legal scholars assert that Bush&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/04/30/bush_challenges_hundreds_of_laws/&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/04/30/bush_challenges_hundreds_of_laws/&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;disobedience contradicts the rule of law&lt;/a&gt;, and the separations of power between Congress and the president. Do you think the next president will follow Bush&#039;s signing statements, or go even further by following his example of issuing many more signing statements?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.gettyimages.com&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/Decider-Says-He-Doesnt-Have-Follow-Certain-Laws-2370193#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/congress">congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/constitution">constitution</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Law">Law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Headline">Headline</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/George W Bush">George W Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Signing Statements">Signing Statements</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Veto">Veto</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:00:39 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/Decider-Says-He-Doesnt-Have-Follow-Certain-Laws-2370193</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Do Tell: What Would you Change?</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/Do-Tell-What-Would-you-Change-314512</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/Do-Tell-What-Would-you-Change-314512&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=105  src=&#039;http://media3.onsugar.com/files/users/0/3362/24_2007/73071790.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Constitution was instated in its original form in 1787 and its contents continually spark conversation and debate about the American ways. When political or moral conversation gets heated, we always add in our two cents, and most times much more.  But what if you could actually change the laws on the issues you don&#039;t agree with? What if you could single handedly abolish, add, or reconstruct any aspect of the American Constitution? Ladies, do tell, what would you alter? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://creative.gettyimages.com/source/home/home.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/Do-Tell-What-Would-you-Change-314512#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Love and Sex">Love and Sex</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/constitution">constitution</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Do Tell">Do Tell</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DearSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/Do-Tell-What-Would-you-Change-314512</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Drug Testing in Public Schools, A Good Idea?</title>
 <link>http://www.fitsugar.com/Drug-Testing-Public-Schools-Good-Idea-123303</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fitsugar.com/Drug-Testing-Public-Schools-Good-Idea-123303&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=107  src=&#039;http://media4.onsugar.com/files/2010/05/18/4/usr/1/12981/drugs-in-school_0.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have all heard about random drug testing in our respective places of employment and in professional sports, but what about in public schools?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16893833/site/newsweek/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;recently announced&lt;/a&gt; that it would be holding four regional summits promoting random student drug testing in public middle and high schools. The program, which has actually already been implemented in almost 1,000 schools across the country, requires that kids submit to random drug testing if they would like to participate in sports and other extracurricular activities. The tests would be looking for cocaine, marijuana, ecstasy, opium-based substances, oxycontin and steroids.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you guys think random drug testing in our schools is a good idea?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;form action=&quot;/Drug-Testing-Public-Schools-Good-Idea-123303&quot;  method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;poll&quot;&gt;  &lt;div class=&quot;vote-form&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;choices&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Drug Testing in Public Schools, A Good Idea?&lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-0-123303&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-0-123303&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;0-123303&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Horrible idea -- Is the constitution completely gone? What&#039;s next finger printing my preschooler?&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-1-123303&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-1-123303&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;1-123303&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Great idea -- Pill popping junkies don&#039;t bring home state championships.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-2-123303&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-2-123303&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;2-123303&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Unsure -- We should patrol kids&#039; drug use, but we also have to teach them free will.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-3-123303&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-3-123303&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;3-123303&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Other -- Tell us below.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[nid]&quot; id=&quot;edit-nid&quot; value=&quot;123303&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;span class=&#039;button&#039;&gt;&lt;span class=&#039;button_copy&#039;&gt;&lt;input class=&#039;fancybutton&#039; type=&#039;submit&#039; name=&quot;op&quot; value=&quot;Vote&quot;  class=&quot;form-submit&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_id]&quot; id=&quot;edit-form_id&quot; value=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fitsugar.com/Drug-Testing-Public-Schools-Good-Idea-123303#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fitsugar.com/tag/sports">sports</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fitsugar.com/tag/Teenagers">Teenagers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fitsugar.com/tag/drugs">drugs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fitsugar.com/tag/random drug testing in schools">random drug testing in schools</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fitsugar.com/tag/middle school">middle school</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fitsugar.com/tag/constitution">constitution</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fitsugar.com/tag/free will">free will</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 03:00:00 PST</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FitSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.fitsugar.com/Drug-Testing-Public-Schools-Good-Idea-123303</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gay Marriage Supporters Cheer as Appeals Court Rules Prop 8 Is Unconstitutional   </title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/Proposition-8-Unconstitutional-21663458</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/Proposition-8-Unconstitutional-21663458&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=160  src=&#039;http://media1.onsugar.com/files/2012/02/06/2/301/3019466/d2efecb525c6fead_prop.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;A federal appeals court has reaffirmed that California&#039;s gay-marriage ban is unconstitutional. Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that voter-passed Proposition 8 violates the 14th Amendment of the US constitution. Gay marriage supporters outside the courthouse in San Francisco cheered the decision, but the fight isn&#039;t over yet. The case will likely make it to the US Supreme Court as early as next year. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court&#039;s ruling stated: “Proposition 8 served no purpose, and had no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California.&quot; The court also refused to throw out the decision of lower court judge, retired Chief US District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, on the basis of his sexual orientation. After the trial, Judge Walker, who is openly gay, revealed that he has been in a same-sex relationship for 10 years. See photos of the celebrations now. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/Proposition-8-Unconstitutional-21663458#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Sex">Sex</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Marriage">Marriage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Gay Marriage">Gay Marriage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Proposition 8">Proposition 8</category>
 <has-gallery></has-gallery>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:05:05 PST</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Annie Scudder</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/Proposition-8-Unconstitutional-21663458</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Christmas List Giveaway</title>
 <link>http://www.fabsugar.com/Christmas-List-Giveaway-20838246</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fabsugar.com/Christmas-List-Giveaway-20838246&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=150 height=150  src=&#039;http://media3.onsugar.com/files/2011/12/50/1/192/1922564/d606b5f6ea64dd5a_rules.xxxlarge_4.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;OFFICIAL CONTEST RULES&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN.  MAKING A PURCHASE DOES NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING.  The Christmas List Giveaway (the “Contest”) is sponsored by Sugar Publishing, Inc. (owner and operator of FabSugar.com &amp;amp; BellaSugar.com), having an address of 111 Sutter Street, Suite 850, San Francisco, CA 94104 (“Sponsor”).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ELIGIBILITY:&lt;br /&gt;
Open only to permanent legal U.S. residents physically residing in the fifty (50) United States of America and the District of Columbia.  Employees of Sponsor and its respective parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, and advertising and promotion agencies and any other entity involved in the development or administration of this Contest, and their immediate family members or household members are not eligible to participate in or win the Contest.  All prizes won by minors will be awarded to their parents or legal guardians on their behalf.  Winners may be required to sign an Affidavit of Eligibility and complete relevant tax forms as a condition to the delivery of the applicable prize.  Void where prohibited by law.  All applicable federal, state and local laws apply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HOW TO ENTER:&lt;br /&gt;
No purchase is necessary to participate in the Contest.  To enter, you must log into your profile at any PopSugar Network site (or register for a profile at http://www.onsugar.com/user/register), navigate to Sponsor Post in FabSugar’s eBay Scout Community (http://ebayscout.fabsugar.com) and leave a comment as described on the entry page between 10:00 am PST on December 12, 2011 and 11:59pm PST on December 18, 2011 (the “Entry Period”).  Entries generated by script, macro or other automated means are void.  Normal time, toll, connection and usage rates, if any, charged by your Internet service provider will apply.  All entries become the property of the Sponsor. One entry per person.&lt;br /&gt;
By registering and leaving a comment, you will be agreeing that your registration and any other information collected in connection with the Contest may be used by Sponsor in accordance with Sugar Publishing, Inc.’s Privacy Policy and may be shared with Sponsor’s affiliated business entities, and that you automatically opt-in to receive email, text messages or other communications from Sponsor.  You may subsequently opt-out of the receipt of such email or communications by following the directions in the email, communications or by contacting Sponsor directly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All registrations must include entrant&#039;s valid email address.  The email address provided by online entrants will be the identity of the entrant and, if selected for a prize, the identity of the winner.  We expressly reserve the right to disqualify any entries that we believe in good faith are generated by an automated program or via scripts.  By participating, all entrants agree to abide by these Official Contest Rules.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PRIZES:&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the Entry Period, there will be one (1) drawing in which one (1) potential winner shall be selected from all eligible entries received during the Entry Period by employees or representatives of the Sponsor to receive the prize one (1) $100 eBay gift card (retail value = $100).  Decisions of the Sponsor are final and binding with respect to all matters related to the Contest.  All prizes will be awarded.  In no event shall the Sponsor be obligated to award more prizes than the number of prizes stated in these Official Contest Rules.  No substitutions (including for cash) are permitted, except that Sponsor reserves the right to substitute a prize of equal or greater monetary value for any prize.  All prizes won by minors will be awarded to their parents or legal guardians on their behalf.  Winners shall be responsible and liable for all federal, state and local taxes on the value of their prize.  To receive a complete list of winners or a copy of the Official Contest Rules, send a self-addressed stamped envelope to Prize Fulfillment, Sugar Publishing, Inc., 111 Sutter Street, Suite 850, San Francisco, CA 94104.  Specify winner&#039;s list or rules on your request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please allow 6-8 weeks for prize delivery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SELECTION:&lt;br /&gt;
The winning entry will be chosen at random.  The number of eligible entries received determines the odds of winning.  In the event of a dispute regarding the identity of the person submitting the entry, the entry will be deemed to be submitted by the person in whose name the e-mail account is registered.  The Contest will be conducted under the supervision of the Sponsor.  The decisions of the Sponsor are final and binding in all matters relating to this Contest.  The winners will be notified by email and/or by private message through the winner’s onsugar.com account; Sponsor reserves the right to determine the method of notification.  Winners must claim their prize within three (3) business days after the date of notification of such prize.  A Contest winner&#039;s failure to respond to the prize notification within the specified three (3) business days will be considered such Contest winner&#039;s forfeiture of the prize and an alternate winner may be selected from the pool of eligible entries.  If an entrant is found to be ineligible, an alternate winner may also be selected from the pool of eligible entries.  Sponsor reserves the right to ship prizes directly to the email and/or mailing address provided by winners during their entry to the Contest. Each entry submitted in response to the Contest and in accordance with the rules will constitute an official entry. All entrants agree to abide by these Official Contest Rules. All entries become the property of the Sponsor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;General Conditions and Releases:&lt;br /&gt;
An entrant or winner may be disqualified from the Contest if he or she fails to comply with each provision of these Official Contest Rules, as determined in the sole discretion of the Sponsor.  Participation in the Contest is at entrant’s own risk.  Sponsor shall not be liable for 1) failed, returned or misdirected notifications based on inaccurate information provided by the winner on the contest entry form, 2) entries and responses to winner notifications which are lost, late, incomplete, illegible, unintelligible, postage-due, misdirected, damaged or otherwise not received by the intended recipient in whole or in part or for computer or technical error of any kind, 3) any electronic miscommunications or failures, technical hardware or software failures of any kind, lost or unavailable network connections, or failed incomplete, garbled or delayed computer transmissions which may limit an entrant&#039;s ability to participate in the Contest, 4) any technical malfunctions of the telephone network, computer on-line system, computer equipment, software, program malfunctions or other failures, delayed computer transactions or network connections that are human, mechanical or technical in nature, or any combination thereof, including any injury or damage to entrant&#039;s or any other person&#039;s computer related to or resulting from downloading any part of this Contest or 5) any warranty of fitness or merchantability of any prize or the function or operation thereof, which shall be the sole responsibility of the manufacturer of the prize.  Sponsor does not make any, and hereby disclaim any and all, representations or warranties of any kind regarding any prize.  Unless prohibited by applicable law, your entry constitutes your permission to use your name, photograph, likeness, voice, address (city and state) and testimonials in all media, in perpetuity, in any manner Sponsor deems appropriate for publicity purposes without any further compensation to such entrant.  By entering or accepting a prize in the Contest, winners agree to be bound by these Official Contest Rules and to conform to all federal, state and local laws and regulations.  When applicable, the winner (or, if the winner is a minor, the winner&#039;s parent or legal guardian) may be required to execute and return to Sponsor within ten (10) business days an Affidavit of Eligibility and a Liability and Publicity Release to be eligible for the prize or an alternate winner will be selected.  Winner may be required to furnish proof of identity, address and birth date in order to receive a prize.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By entering, an entrant agrees to release and hold harmless Sponsor and its respective parents, subsidiaries and affiliated entities, directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents, and representatives from any damage, injury, death, loss, claim, action, demand, or other liability (collectively, “Claims”) that may arise from their acceptance, possession and/or use of any prize or their participation in this promotion, or from any misuse or malfunction of any prize awarded, regardless of whether such Claims, or knowledge of the facts constituting such Claims, exist at the time of entry or arise at any time thereafter.  Any person attempting to defraud or in any way tamper with this Contest will be ineligible for prizes and may be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.  Sponsor reserves the right to modify these Official Contest Rules in any way or at any time.  Sponsor reserves the right, in their sole discretion, to cancel or suspend this Contest should viruses, bugs or other causes beyond their control corrupt the administration, security or proper play of the Contest.  In the event of cancellation or suspension, Sugar shall promptly post a notice on the Contest entry page to such effect.  This Contest shall be governed by California law.  By participating in this contest, entrants agree that California courts shall have jurisdiction over any dispute or litigation arising from or relating to this Contest and that venue shall be only in San Francisco, California.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.fabsugar.com/Christmas-List-Giveaway-20838246#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fabsugar.com/tag/contest rules">contest rules</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:00:00 PST</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sponsor</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.fabsugar.com/Christmas-List-Giveaway-20838246</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>LilSugar’s Huggies® Holiday Prize Package Giveaway</title>
 <link>http://www.lilsugar.com/LilSugars-Huggies-Holiday-Prize-Package-Giveaway-20658872</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lilsugar.com/LilSugars-Huggies-Holiday-Prize-Package-Giveaway-20658872&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=100 height=100  src=&#039;http://media1.onsugar.com/files/2011/12/48/4/192/1922664/01d4122be9a09bd6_BellaSugar-CEW-Award-Winners-Giveaway-Day-11-Official-Rules.xxxlarge_4.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. MAKING A PURCHASE DOES NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING. ODDS OF WINNING WILL DEPEND ON THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ENTRIES RECEIVED. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED BY LAW. ONLINE ENTRY ONLY AND INTERNET CONNECTION REQUIRED. AFFIDAVIT OF ELIGIBILITY AND RELEASE OF LIABILITY FORM MAY BE REQUIRED&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LilSugar’s Huggies® Holiday Prize Package! (the “Giveaway”) is sponsored by Sugar Publishing, Inc. (owner and operator of lilsugar.com) and having an address of 111 Sutter Street, Suite 850, San Francisco, CA 94104 (“Sponsor”).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ELIGIBILITY: Open only to U.S. citizens and permanent legal U.S. residents at least eighteen (18) years of age at the time of entry who physically reside in one of the fifty (50) United States of America or the District of Columbia, excluding Rhode Island, all U.S. territories and possessions and all overseas military installations. Employees of Sponsor, and their respective parents, affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies and any other entity involved in the development or administration of this Giveaway (collectively, “Sweepstakes Entities”), and their immediate family members or household members (defined as spouses and biological, adoptive or step-parents, legal guardians, children, siblings, or grandparents, their respective spouses and any dependent under federal income tax law) are not eligible to participate in or win the Giveaway. The winner will be required to sign an Affidavit of Eligibility and complete relevant tax forms as a condition to the delivery of the applicable prize. Void where prohibited by law. All applicable federal, state and local laws apply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HOW TO ENTER: No purchase is necessary to participate in the Giveaway. To enter you must navigate to the Giveaway entry post (http://www.lilsugar.com/TBD ) and submit your email between 6:00am PST on Saturday, December 3, 2011 and 11:59pm PST on Friday, December 9, 2011 (the “Entry Period”). By entering online, you will be agreeing to receive Sponsor emails.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is only one (1) entry per person.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Normal time, toll, connection and usage rates, if any, charged by your Internet service provider will apply. All entries become the property of the Sponsor. Entries generated by script, macro or other automated means are void. By submitting your email in accordance with the entry process, you will be agreeing that your registration and any other information collected in connection with the Giveaway may be used by Sponsor in accordance with Sugar Inc. Privacy Policy, a current copy of which can be found here: http://www.sugarinc.com/privacy. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, information collected from entrant will only be used for direct marketing purposes if entrant consents to use in such manner. Sponsor expressly reserves the right to disqualify any entries that it believes in good faith are generated by an automated program or via scripts. By participating, all entrants agree to abide by these Official Giveaway Rules.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PRIZE: At the end of the Entry Period, there will be one (1) drawing in which one (1) potential Grand Prize winner shall be selected from all eligible entries received during the Entry Period by employees or representatives of the Sponsor to each receive the Grand Prize of one (1) $500 Babies-R-Us gift card (Retail Value: $500.00), one (1) changing table (Estimated Retail Value: $350.00), one (1) Diaper Deko Plus  (retail value: $40.00), one (1) set of Diaper Deko Refills (Retail Value: $30), and fifteen (15) packs of Huggies (Retail Value: $450.00); Total Estimated Retail Value: $1,370.00). If potential Grand Prize winner forfeits or does not claim the prize, prize will be re-awarded, in Sponsor’s sole discretion. Other restrictions may apply. Decisions of the Sponsor are final and binding with respect to all matters related to the Giveaway. All prizes will be awarded. In no event shall the Sponsor be obligated to award more prizes than the number of prizes stated in these Official Giveaway Rules. No substitutions (including for cash) are permitted, except that Sponsors reserve the right to substitute a prize of equal or greater monetary value for any prize. All prizes won by minors will be awarded to their parents or legal guardians on their behalf. Winners shall be responsible and liable for all federal, state and local taxes on the value of their prize. If required by Sponsor, the winner must complete and return to Sponsor an IRS Form W-9 that reflects winner’s taxpayer identification number or social security number. The winner will receive from Sponsors an IRS form 1099-MISC at the end of the calendar year, and a copy of such form will be filed with the IRS. To receive a complete list of winners or a copy of the Official Giveaway Rules, send a self-addressed stamped envelope to Prize Fulfillment, Sugar Inc., 111 Sutter Street, Suite 850, San Francisco, CA 94104. Specify winner&#039;s list or rules on your request. Please allow 6-8 weeks for prize delivery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SELECTION: The winning entry will be chosen at random. The number of eligible entries received determines the odds of winning. In the event of a dispute regarding the identity of the person submitting the entry, the entry will be deemed to be submitted by the person in whose name the e-mail account is registered. The Giveaway will be conducted under the supervision of the Sponsor. The decisions of the Sponsor are final and binding in all matters relating to this Giveaway. Sponsor reserves the right to determine the method of notification. Winners must claim their prize within three (3) business days after the date of notification of such prize. A Giveaway winner&#039;s failure to respond to the prize notification within the specified three (3) business days will be considered such Giveaway winner&#039;s forfeiture of the prize and an alternate winner may be selected from the pool of eligible entries. If an entrant is found to be ineligible, an alternate winner may also be selected from the pool of eligible entries. Sponsor reserves the right to ship prizes directly to the email and/or mailing address provided by winners during their entry to the Giveaway. Each entry submitted in response to the Giveaway and in accordance with the rules will constitute an official entry. One (1) entry per person. Duplicate entries will be void. All entrants agree to abide by these Official Giveaway Rules. All entries become the property of the Sponsor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GENERAL CONDITIONS AND RELEASES: An entrant or winner may be disqualified from the Sweepstakes if he or she fails to comply with each provision of these Official Rules, as determined in the sole discretion of the Sponsor. Participation in the Sweepstakes is at entrant’s own risk. By receipt of any prize, the applicable winner agrees to release and hold harmless Sweepstake Entities. Releasees shall not be liable for 1) failed, returned or misdirected notifications based on inaccurate information provided by the winner on the on the contest entry form) entries and responses to winner notifications which are lost, late, incomplete, illegible, unintelligible, postage-due, misdirected, damaged or otherwise not received by the intended recipient in whole or in part or for computer or technical error of any kind, 3) any electronic miscommunications or failures, technical hardware or software failures of any kind, lost or unavailable network connections, or failed incomplete, garbled or delayed computer transmissions which may limit an entrant&#039;s ability to participate in the Sweepstakes, 4) any technical malfunctions of the telephone network, computer on-line system, computer equipment, software, program malfunctions or other failures, delayed computer transactions or network connections that are human, mechanical or technical in nature, or any combination thereof, including any injury or damage to entrant&#039;s or any other person&#039;s computer related to or resulting from downloading any part of this Sweepstakes or 5) any warranty of fitness or merchantability of any prize or the function or operation thereof. Releasees do not make any, and hereby disclaims any and all, representations or warranties of any kind regarding any prize. Unless prohibited by applicable law, the acceptance of the Grand Prize by the winner constitutes his/her permission for the Sponsor to use his/her name, address (state) biographical information and testimonials for advertising and/or publicity purposes in connection with this Sweepstakes only, worldwide and in all forms of media now known or hereafter developed, in perpetuity, without further compensation.  By entering or accepting a prize in the Sweepstakes, winner agrees to be bound by these Official Rules and to conform to all federal, state and local laws and regulations. The winner will be required to execute and return to Sponsor within five (5) business days an Affidavit of Eligibility and a Liability and (where imposing such condition is legal) and any additional documents required by Sponsor in connection with the possibility of receiving the Grand Prize. Winner may be required to furnish proof of identity, address and birth date in order to receive a prize. Any person attempting to defraud or in any way tamper with this Sweepstakes will be ineligible for prizes and may be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Sponsor reserves the right to modify these Official Rules in any way or at any time. Sponsor reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to modify, cancel or suspend this Sweepstakes should viruses, bugs or other causes beyond Sponsor’s control corrupts the administration, security or proper play of the Sweepstakes, or for any reason that Sponsor believes in good faith would be fair to the entrants and the conduct of the Sweepstakes. In the event of cancellation or suspension, Sponsor shall promptly post a notice on the Contest entry page to such effect. This Sweepstakes shall be governed by California law. By participating in this Sweepstakes, entrants agree that California courts shall have jurisdiction over any dispute or litigation arising from or relating to this Sweepstakes and that venue shall be only in San Francisco, California.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MISCELLANEOUS: The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of these Official Rules will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision. In the event that any provision of the Official Rules is determined to be invalid or otherwise unenforceable or illegal, the other provisions will remain in effect and will be construed in accordance with their terms as if the invalid or illegal provision were not contained herein. Sponsor’s failure to enforce any term of these Official Rules will not constitute a waiver of that provision. When terms such as &quot;may&quot; are used in these Official Rules, Sponsor has sole and absolute discretion. Entrants agree to waive any rights to claim ambiguity of these Official Rules. Headings are solely for convenience of reference and will not be deemed to affect in any manner the meaning or intent of the documents or any provision hereof. In the event there is a discrepancy or inconsistency between disclosures or other statements contained in any Sweepstakes-related materials, privacy policy or terms of use on the Website and/or the terms and conditions of the Official Rules, the Official Rules shall prevail, govern and control and the discrepancy will be resolved in Sponsor’s sole and absolute discretion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Facebook is not affiliated with this Giveaway. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.lilsugar.com/LilSugars-Huggies-Holiday-Prize-Package-Giveaway-20658872#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.lilsugar.com/tag/rules">rules</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:10:51 PST</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LilSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.lilsugar.com/LilSugars-Huggies-Holiday-Prize-Package-Giveaway-20658872</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mississippi Votes to Keep Birth Control, IVF, &amp; Abortion Legal  </title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/Mississippi-Personhood-Measure-Defeated-20346034</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/Mississippi-Personhood-Measure-Defeated-20346034&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=160  src=&#039;http://media1.onsugar.com/files/2011/11/45/3/301/3019466/46ef539fd30c3f31_Picture_1.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier this week feminist icon &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/Gloria-Steinem-Thinks-Kim-Kardashian-Wasting-Her-Life-20331658&quot; &gt;Gloria Steinem told us&lt;/a&gt; that reproductive rights were the single biggest accomplishment for women she&#039;s witnessed. Yesterday Mississippi voters had a chance to roll back the clock by passing a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hVL2o14jmzOqTI3UdpjZMFwRbmqA?docId=880bf714c87c46a58a01b9a6eea33939&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hVL2o14jmzOqTI3UdpjZMFwRbmqA&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ballot measure that would have defined a fertilized egg as a person&lt;/a&gt;. They voted against it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Initiative 26 would have added this language to the state&#039;s constitution: &quot;The term ‘person&#039; or ‘persons&#039; shall include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning or the functional equivalent thereof.&quot; By giving personhood rights to a fertilized egg, the amendment would have banned abortion, even in the case of rape or incest, and would have also outlawed in vitro fertilization and IUDs. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Birth control like the pill or Plan B would have likely been banned too, since many forms of hormonal birth control prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus, should the hormones fail at preventing fertilization in the first place. Critics also warned that any miscarriage could initiate a criminal investigation if the measure passed. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The initiative sponsored by Personhood USA was put up for a vote in Mississippi because it is one of the more conservative, pro-life states. They were hoping a legal challenge would eventually make the US Supreme Court revisit Roe v. Wade and ultimately overturn it. Colorado voters have twice rejected similar measures before. Despite losing in a very conservative state yesterday, the life-at-fertilization camp says they&#039;ll continue their efforts. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/Mississippi-Personhood-Measure-Defeated-20346034#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Birth Control">Birth Control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/women">women</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Abortion">Abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Mississippi">Mississippi</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:25:22 PST</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Annie Scudder</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/Mississippi-Personhood-Measure-Defeated-20346034</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Parents Group Upset Over Teen Sex in Glee Tonight</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/Glee-Sex-Episode-20328949</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/Glee-Sex-Episode-20328949&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=160  src=&#039;http://media1.onsugar.com/files/2011/11/45/2/301/3019466/e6c5678e63e1aa56_thumb.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The show hasn&#039;t even aired yet, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://insidetv.ew.com/2011/11/08/glee-teen-sex/&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;insidetv.ew.com/2011/11/08/glee-teen-sex/&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Parents Television Council is already angry about the teen sex in Glee&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s episode tonight titled &quot;The First Time.&quot; Two McKinley High couples - one straight and one same-sex - will be getting it on tonight, and the parents group isn&#039;t happy about it. While it would appear to be the &lt;i&gt;gay&lt;/i&gt; teen sex PTC is targeting, the group&#039;s president Tim Winter says it&#039;s really about the age and audience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The fact that &lt;b&gt;Glee&lt;/b&gt; intends to not only broadcast, but celebrate children having sex is reprehensible. The gender of the high school characters involved is irrelevant. Teen sex is now more prevalent on TV than adult sex and &lt;b&gt;Glee&lt;/b&gt; is only playing into that trend. Research proves that television is a teen sexual super peer that can, and likely will, influence a teen&#039;s decision to become sexually active. Fox knows the show inherently attracts kids; celebrating teen sex constitutes gross recklessness.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While &lt;b&gt;Glee&lt;/b&gt; is set in high school, I wouldn&#039;t call it a kids show, and it has been frank about sex since day one. The first season revolved around Quinn&#039;s teen pregnancy after all. And where was the PTC outrage when &quot;The Power of &lt;a class=&quot;sugar_inline_link&quot; title=&quot;Latest photos and news for Madonna&quot; href=&quot;http://www.popsugar.com/Madonna&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Madonna&lt;/a&gt;&quot; episode aired, which was all about getting in touch with your sexual side and losing your virginity, and featured various couples rolling around in bed? Instead, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1649574/glee-britney-spears-episode-slammed-by-parents-television-council.jhtml&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.mtv.com/news/articles/1649574/glee-britney-spears-episode-slammed-by-parents-television-council.jhtml&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;PTC called out the Britney Spears episode&lt;/a&gt; for featuring a &quot;troubled pop star&quot; as a role model and, of course, that pervy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/Glee-GQ-Photo-Shoot-Terry-Richardson-11550656&quot; &gt;Glee GQ photo shoot&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t find the rhyme or reason to what ruffles the parents group&#039;s feathers, but do you think something as common as teen sex on TV is really the issue? Is the gay teen sex the real root of the controversy? And do you think the &lt;b&gt;Glee&lt;/b&gt; creators have a responsibility to keep the show kid friendly? Tells us what you think in the comments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/Glee-Sex-Episode-20328949#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/TV">TV</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Sex">Sex</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Gay">Gay</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/virginity">virginity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/Glee">Glee</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:50:18 PST</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tara Sharp</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/Glee-Sex-Episode-20328949</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

