<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
 <title>TresSugar</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com</link>
 <description>Smart. Sexy. Fun. </description>
 <language>en</language>
 <atom:link href="http://www.tressugar.com/tag/War+Slang/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
 <title>War Slang: New Words From US Soldiers</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/2515163</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/2515163&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=111  src=&#039;http://media.onsugar.com/files/upl1/16/162306/47_2008/b518f7ac46f7166f_iraq.large.jpg&#039;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Slang is hard to define, but you know it when you hear it. It&#039;s sarcastic and witty (when it&#039;s good) and establishes social bonds. War slang is no different, though it serves the additional function of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.good.is/?p=12825&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;exposing military problems&lt;/a&gt;. Slang from earlier wars - skedaddle, triumph, ballistic - has made a home in our vernacular, and now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-op-bay28jan28,1,86607,full.story?coll=la-news-comment&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;US soldiers in Iraq are playing with words&lt;/a&gt;, too. Check out what they&#039;re saying:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Splurge&lt;/b&gt;: Mocking term for &quot;surge.&quot;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hillbilly armor&lt;/b&gt;: Improvised vehicle armor, salvaged from digging through landfills for scrap metal to bolster armor on vehicles.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sandbox&lt;/b&gt;: Iraq&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Embrace the suck&lt;/b&gt;: The situation is bad; deal with it.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Geardo&lt;/b&gt;: The guy who has to have all the latest and greatest gear on his uniform, yet doesn’t know how to use it. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To see the rest, read more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fobbits&lt;/b&gt;: A play on FOB (Forward Operations Base). It&#039;s reserved for base-bound soldiers who rarely get out.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Groundhog Day&lt;/b&gt;: Every day of duty in Iraq.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Rummy&#039;s Dummies&lt;/b&gt;: A derogatory name for the US military under the leadership of former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Single-digit midget&lt;/b&gt;: A member of the armed services who has nine days or less left of duty.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Waxed&lt;/b&gt;: To get hit hard or killed.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Weekend warrior&lt;/b&gt;: US reservist or National Guard soldier.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None of these sound destined for the everyday, but then I doubt anyone saw &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNAFU&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;snafu&lt;/a&gt;&quot; coming. Though &quot;weekend warrior&quot; could make the argument that it&#039;s arrived - if by arrived you mean cliche magazine headlines. But what do you think? Will any of these make it out of the desert?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/2515163#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Iraq War">Iraq War</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/War Slang">War Slang</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:30:54 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/2515163</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>And Now We&#039;re Russia: What&#039;s With Obama&#039;s Czars?</title>
 <link>http://www.tressugar.com/2500537</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/2500537&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=110  src=&#039;http://media.onsugar.com/files/upl1/16/162306/46_2008/84ae47304f8e52fb_83602337.large.jpg&#039;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Forget becoming Communist Russia, try a cabinet filled with all-powerful czars. When &quot;climate czar&quot; first popped into our lexicon earlier this week, I thought it was a one-time title for Al Gore because he&#039;s already been vice president - a cabinet title would practically be a demotion - and it has a nice ring to it. And because, really, how can there be a climate czar without it being Al Gore?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/2496483&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Al Gore doesn&#039;t want the job&lt;/a&gt;, and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/11/obamas_czars.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;slew of new czar titles&lt;/a&gt; have been tossed around this week: auto czar, tech czar, energy czar, education czar, style czar (joking! . . . but &lt;a href=&quot;http://fabsugar.com/tag/Tim+Gunn&quot; &gt;Tim Gunn&lt;/a&gt;, yes?). What makes a czar different from a regular cabinet secretary? To find out, read more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Czar is really just &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czar&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a slang term in the US for a government position&lt;/a&gt; with lots of power. They report directly to the president instead of the president&#039;s chief of staff, so any czars in the Obama administration can work around what will likely be Rahm Emanuel&#039;s tight grip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t think the US doesn&#039;t already have czars, though. The senate voted to establish a drug czar in 1982 to control US drug policy, and the Bush administration established a terrorism czar, war czar (though &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/11/the_skinny/main2670807.shtml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Bush never found any takers so the position remains open&lt;/a&gt;), and cybersecurity czar (highest ranking position in Homeland Security). Just last month, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2229544,00.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Congress agreed to appoint a copyright czar&lt;/a&gt;, which will be named by President-elect Obama.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d take a world with copyright and climate czars over war and terrorism czars any day. But what&#039;s the point anyway? Is it dangerous to give one person so much power, or a good way to get a lot accomplished?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.tressugar.com/2500537#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Barack Obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Al Gore">Al Gore</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Climate Czar">Climate Czar</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Czar">Czar</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:30:36 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.tressugar.com/2500537</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
