Johnson & Johnson

Beauty News

Johnson & Johnson to Tweak Its Formulas

After years of pressure from environmental and consumer groups, Johnson & Johnson has pledged to remove a wide range of chemicals from its products, the New York Times reports.

After years of pressure from environmental and consumer groups, Johnson & Johnson has pledged to remove a wide range of chemicals from its products, the New York Times reports. The company has committed to nix substances like formaldehyde by the end of 2015 from their adult products, which include brands like Neutrogena, Aveeno, and Clean & Clear. Johnson & Johnson is the first major consumer brand to take on such a promise, as it had already begun removing toxins from its baby products after consumer concern.

The push came after the Campaign For Safe Cosmetics ran a series of tests on a group of products and found substances such as formaldehyde and other carcinogens. These chemicals are not listed on the products' labels since they are technically byproducts of the manufacturing process, not added ingredients. Johnson & Johnson is removing these substances from their formulas "even though as a scientist I will sit here and tell you these things are perfectly safe," said Susan Nettesheim, vice president for product stewardship and toxicology for the company's consumer brands. Johnson & Johnson has also promised to remove phthalates and parabens from its products. And since demand for eco-friendly and safe products is growing, the move could prove extremely successful for the company and its brands.

Poll

Would You Use Johnson & Johnson's Baby Shampoo?

The family company known for its "no more tears" shampoo has been asked by 40 parent, healthcare, and environmental organizations to remove known chemicals from its products by the end of the year.

The family company known for its "no more tears" shampoo has been asked by 40 parent, healthcare, and environmental organizations to remove known chemicals from its products by the end of the year. One report said:

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics reported in March that it found Johnson & Johnson's Baby Shampoo and other children's products contained formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane, both of which have been found to cause cancer in animals and listed by the Environmental Protection Agency as probable human carcinogens.

A Johnson & Johnson representative said the trace levels were considered safe by some regulatory agencies. Would you take a chance using this on your babe?

News

Olympic Sponsors Responsible for Human Rights Violations?

Pro-Tibet groups are joining together to call out the corporate sponsors of the Beijing Olympics.

Pro-Tibet groups are joining together to call out the corporate sponsors of the Beijing Olympics. The groups say that unless the companies use their influence to pressure China, they are complicit in a humanitarian disaster.

Twelve global sponsors, including Coca Cola, General Electric, McDonald's, Visa, Johnson & Johnson and Omega have paid a combined $80 million for the four year exclusive sponsorship deal. Activists explain that together these companies have a GDP equal to Canada's, the world's eighth largest economy. Thus, they can wield a lot of influence.

Do you expect sponsors to get involved in global politics, considering they work with governments, employ lobbying firms, and maintain international presences?

Are human rights more than politics, therefore giving everyone an obligation to pressure China, including corporations and consumers? Or, should the sponsors be commended for supporting the Olympic movement, which would be impossible without them?

Source