One sees these fashion infractions mostly on tourists. I must admit, when travelling to a foreign country, I, too, wear a money belt. But not a money belt that sticks out three inches from my body, begging to be ripped off! And don't get me started on the "mom jeans" shorts hiked so far up the wearer no longer has a back. You just know that if we could see further down, this dude is sporting black sneakers with white socks. So what's tackier?
Cultbeauty
As terrible as those bum bags are (that's what we call them), mom shorts are definitely more offensive to the eyes!
1Don't make me choose. Both are hideous in their own ways.
2I can't choose on this one!
3After seeing "The Snuggler" I'm choosing the dude-mom jeans.
4I can't choose either...both are horrible!
5they are horrible, but I have to admit, I use a fanny pack. before you all freak, I teach group exercise and I put my microphone pack in there so my hands are free and it doesn't fall out of my pants. If only there was another way!!
6grotesque!
7Ok then anned
... you're forgiven.
8the exposed waist line makes it easy for my; the waist wallet!
9eeew, mom shorts are icky, meow
10HAHAHHAH! At least fanny packs have a purpose!
11both.gross. but i think the mom shorts a tackier b/c at least there is a purpose for a fanny pack.
12i voted mom jeans but i really ment BOTH lol
13The Hippack is better than the short shorts. If a man wears the hip-pack he is just a sad creature stuck in the 80's....the cut off shorts shorts? You have to take a pair of scissors to a pair of full length jeans and cut!
14Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.