Landmark Decision in Manboob Ogling Struggle
by CitizenSugar 4
Click to ReadLandmark Decision in Manboob Ogling Struggle Last year a British court found Kevin Bassett, 44, guilty of violating the 2003 Sexual Offences Act after he secretly filmed a man in his swimming trunks and no top at a swimming pool. Lawyers argued that the man's chest did not constitute "private parts," and the act only referred to women's breasts as such. A judge this week squashed that ruling, saying, "This act didn't mean to refer to the male chest but only to female breasts, it follows that the judge's directions on the meaning of breasts was erroneous." And check out Giggle's legendary picture collage and take on the case.
CommentsLink Love
- Gay Summer wedding stress relieved by Xanax in SNL skit HuffPost Weddings
- A feminist leaderboard for the women of Game of Thrones — The Jane Dough
- Single women mourn the loss of NY's Fleet Week — HowAboutWe
- 8 real couples getting married at city hall — Cosmopolitan
- How not to deal with a boyfriend who finds your vagina repulsive — The Frisky
- Mom says homophobia caused teen daughter's statutory rape charge — Newser
- Sizzling date-night ideas for cook-loving couples — YourTango
- 6 signs that your life got boring — HelloGiggles
- If Hollywood was honest about sex . . . — Cracked
- Download your ultimate wedding planning checklist — POPSUGAR Smart Living
4 Comments