2008 kicked off with the breathless anticipation of traditional campaign faves: Iowa, New Hampshire, tiny whisperings of South Carolina. But while the frontrunners continued to pound the pavement, themselves, and each other, one (who bizarrely keeps leading in national polls regardless of his seeming obliviousness to the campaign) kept out of the snow altogether.

Rudy Guiliani's embraced a new method of campaigning: just don't. Now, different from the Fred Thompson method of napping in the La-Z-Boy 'til it's over, Guiliani is branding this anti-campaign strategy "Florida, Florida, Florida." The state's 57 delegates are bundled in a "winner take all" prize. Chasing big numbers, he's committed to spend his time not with a broad cross-section of the electorate but by concentrating almost exclusively on Florida, Illinois, Missouri, New York, California, Georgia, and New Jersey. To see how this plays out nationwide, please read more.

While the argument "that's where the money, the Guiliani-sympathizers, and the densest proportion of delegates are" certainly qualifies this as a "strategy," can you really be a viable candidate if you only court half a dozen states? Picking and choosing and campaigning where you think you can get the most for your money (and protecting your reputation) is a little like starting the marathon on foot and then riding the subway to the finish line — but it's a long, long ride until November.

Given this strategy, is Rudy Giuliani still a viable candidate?

Source