Administration Rejects Regulating Greenhouse Gases

July 11, 2008

Click to Read

Administration Rejects Regulating Greenhouse Gases
The Bush administration has rejected regulating greenhouse gases blamed for global warming, saying it would cause too many job losses at a time when the economy is in trouble. The Environmental Protection Agency laid out a buffet of options Friday on how to reduce greenhouse gases from cars, ships, trains, power plants, factories, and refineries. But it said that it's leaving the decisions on them to the next president and the new Congress.

Comments

12 Comments

UnDave35 4 years 44 weeks

Especially since less than .5% of greenhouse gas emissions is caused by humans.

UnDave35 4 years 44 weeks

I agree that leaving this to the next administration is a good thing. The longer we wait, the more data we can collect disproving this whole Human caused global warming. I don't think we'll have collected enough new data in 6 months, but it's a start.

Kimpossible 4 years 44 weeks

For those who are not fans or supporters of Bush, isn't him leaving this for the next administration a good thing? I mean really the way he would handle it (and I don't know how that would be), would it be satisfactory? So, isn't it better that he's leaving it for the next guy? Also what can seriously be done in 6 months?I'm not trying to be argumentative these are just thoughts that came to my mind when reading the comments.Oh and the final sentence in the header is confusing... But it (it being the EPA?) said that it's (again the EPA?) leaving the decisions on them to the next president and the new Congress.

Kimpossible 4 years 44 weeks

For those who are not fans or supporters of Bush, isn't him leaving this for the next administration a good thing? I mean really the way he would handle it (and I don't know how that would be), would it be satisfactory? So, isn't it better that he's leaving it for the next guy? Also what can seriously be done in 6 months? I'm not trying to be argumentative these are just thoughts that came to my mind when reading the comments. Oh and the final sentence in the header is confusing... But it (it being the EPA?) said that it's (again the EPA?) leaving the decisions on them to the next president and the new Congress.

Jude C 4 years 44 weeks

Exactly, MartiniLush!Chalk this one up to yet another problem to be left to the next administration. :OY:

Jude C 4 years 44 weeks

Exactly, MartiniLush! Chalk this one up to yet another problem to be left to the next administration. :OY:

yesteryear 4 years 44 weeks

ugh. yeah, lets leave it for the next administration and congress. fantastic.

stephley 4 years 44 weeks

The Bush Administration, leading the way on the environment...

MartiniLush 4 years 44 weeks

On the flipside, maybe implementing new technologies to reduce these gasses may CREATE jobs. (???)

raciccarone 4 years 44 weeks

THAT'S BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIVE THERE!!!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. I'M DROWING!!!

UnDave35 4 years 44 weeks

I don't think we'll have to worry about NY being underwater.

raciccarone 4 years 44 weeks

I hope when NY is underwater that won't lose jobs either.

Link Love

12 Comments

You Might Also Like