You might not after you get a glimpse, if you dare (extremely NSFW!) of guesshermuff.blogspot.com. It's so offensive in both content and intent that you'll have to cut and paste it yourself if you want to see it. (No hyperlink!)
I'm letting you know about it to remind you that those naked pictures you give to your boyfriend could resurface for strange dudes to leer at and comment on either because your boyfriend's computer is stolen, someone gets hold of its contents somehow — or he's out for revenge. (And to you folks who just like to post nekkid pics of yourself just because, I'm talking to you, too!)
Here's the premise of this site. On its main page, you see the image of a clothed woman. Some of the women might already have naked pictures of themselves on the Internet as "web-cam girls," but a lot of the photos look like they're just someone's girlfriend who took sexy boudoir photos — and I say "boudoir photo" euphemistically. (We're not talking white corsets and parasols here.) Underneath the clothed image, you can click on a link that will take you to naked pictures. Before you do that (and by "you" I mean some gross guy), you're supposed to guess how the woman grooms herself down there.
Thanks to Weffie for alerting womankind of such pestilence on the Internet. As she pointedly told me, there are photo-removal request instructions at the bottom of the page, which suggests that most of the women featured here have no freaking idea they're there until they see it or someone who knows them sees it. So wrong!
Just another reminder the next time you think only your significant other is the only person who may ever see you naked . . . just think about this site.
Mantaray
J Brand
Diane von Furstenberg
I just don't understand the point of it.
1No photos.
2i just thought it was stupid when i first saw it months ago. the tone of this article is odd - im sure that half of the boobs on collegehumor.com weren't posted with consent and i dont know how easy it is to have pictures taken down from there.
3No photos either. The reality of life is that you never really know people. They can be someone when you are with them, but once you break up the story is different, and you never know what they can do for revenge.
4No one will ever have naked pics of me. Ever.
5First of all, the stock photo with this article CRACKS ME UP. I can only hope the ones on the site are that awesome. Secondly, I would never ever let anyone take naked photos of me. I'm considering having my professional photographer roommate take some sexy (FULLY clothed) photos of me to give to my boy, since I know she'll develop them herself..chain of custody and all
my boyfriend has some racier pics of me on his iPhone, but my face is not involved. I suppose if need be, I could always SWEAR it's not me
6I have naked pictures of myself, or rather, my boyfriend and girlfriend have them. I'm not worried, because I trust them completely, but this is the first time that I have trusted someone enough to do that.
That said, that site is despicable.
7I'm comfortable with my body. If there were nude pictures of me on a site like this - I'd think the guy that did it was an A-hole, but I wouldn't lose sleep over it.
8tlsgirl: "I have naked pictures of myself, or rather, my boyfriend and girlfriend have them"
I think that has to be the most awesome sentence ever!
9Tee hee, thanks Smacks
10Why would anyone do something stupid like that, no photos or video tapes, if they dont have my face on it maybe.. i could send a pic of my butt or my breasts but not full frontal.
11Angela123: The "stock photo" you're referring to is actually a photo of a woman on the site. I bet she has no idea she's there, or that there's a picture of her "muff" later on...I'm kind of surprised a lot of you don't find this abusive, assuming that most of the women have no idea their pictures are here in this way.
12Other than the nudity it's just like any other photo site on the web (And many, including FailBlog and CollegeHumor include nudity!). You submit someone else's picture without their knowledge and people laugh or oggle at their expense. This is what happens when we live in such a realm of publicity and easy access to making private things public.
13That's disgusting. There are just way too many perverts in the world.
14Hmm, I don't think this is like any other photo site on the web. These women are being violated because they don't know their photos are on that site. The photos were taken for private consumption and now they're being tossed on the web in a really degrading manner. Horrifying and — oh, I'm gonna say it — misogynist.
15How about http://www.gothsinhotweather.com ? Do you think the people being laughed at in these pictures submitted the pictures themselves?
Again, I bring up CollegeHumor because I just can't believe that every single picture of a girl on that website was submitted with the girl's permission.
16I'm going to guess that 50% of the topless photos on college humor were submitted by an ex-boyfriend....
17I would only take nude pictures I could show in an art gallery.
18I think this site and others alike are disgusting! I would like to know if there are any laws that would prevent these pictures from being posted in such a public manner. I guess all a girl can do is refuse to take the photo in the first place. I wish the website wasn't even mentioned on tressugar or any other website in order to prevent more people from finding out about it and potentially using it!
19I agree, disgusting. However, how do you know that it was men that posted these pictures? Maybe some woman wanted to have her picture up there. Some of these are self portraits (on both sides) of the women.
20thats why i don't send ANY boyfriends I've had nude pics. EVER
21Hey sweetpea, I figured maybe some web cam girls may have posted their pics or don't care they're up there, but the majority of these photos look like candid photos not meant for public consumption.
22The photos were taken for private consumption
Um, how do you figure?
the majority of these photos look like candid photos
Have you even looked at the site? Most of them are really posed photos, especially the one where she's naked walking down a highway.
If you were half as offended as you pretend to be, you wouldn't have posted this site to the Sugar Sites to let more people know about it.
23I think it's good they posted this story up to warn people... and check just in case their photos are up there
24I'm surprised that not a lot of people are outraged/disgusted too. I think the site is horrible, degrading, and disgusting. Guessing how she grooms?! Wtf!
25Oh hey, Tres! (comment #24) I didn't know they let you comment anonymously, too!
26c'mon, girls. help each other out. why don't we all ask for these photos to be removed? we could stop it, maybe.
27Taking nude photos, esp. on a cell is just asking for something terribly horrible to happen. Either the phone gets stolen, a jerk friend or sibling of the owner of the phone finds it, or when you break up, you have an ex with a vengeance. Gawd, just say no!
28The article is a welcome warning about a real danger. Posting intimate pics without consent is a terrible violation of trust. The outrage at that issue I understand. But in my view some of the tone here about other parts of it is a bit huffy and prudish. I don't quite understand the revulsion at the fact that men find nude women titillating to look at. Couples generally find this a welcome fact of human nature within their own relationships. Yet that same fact of human nature draws ire and outrage when anyone else does the looking: "perverts," "disgusting," "gross," etc. So I guess sexuality is inherently "gross" except when you and the man of your desire are enjoying it? Perhaps the "disgusting" part is that a man's eye finds nude women in general arousing to behold, not just you in particular? One wonders, then, if some of the outrage expressed here is fueled more by insecurity than morality.
The part I do understand is the dissatisfaction with anything other than monogamy, as applied here in the case of anger at men looking at other nude ladies besides their own spouse. If that's the issue, then defend it as such. Get married, say your vows to be mutually faithful until death do you part, and the whole traditional bit. But if we're just talking about girlfriends and boyfriends and semi-permanent casual couplings, all the huffy posturing about it being "disgusting" and "gross" and "perverted" to indulge a non-monogamous eye seems pretty hypocritical.
29My GF has given me nude pics before but I'm not some scum bag who would pull sh*t like that hell I'd be mad if SHE put those pics on the net much less put them up there myself
30Wahey, thanks for the link! I'm guessing somes muffs as we speak!
31Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.