Yesterday anyone who bought a pack of smokes found their wallet a little lighter. The federal tax on cigarettes jumped 62 cents, the largest tobacco tax increase in history.
Smoking is proving to be a pricey habit, especially in places like New York City. You can't get your hands on a pack for less than $10.50. Some people spend hundreds a month on cigarettes. That's enough to cut back!
The new tax revenue will be used to expand children's health care. Some poorer smokers argue that the tax hike hits them disproportionately. When it comes to taxing cigarettes, do you think fairness should matter?









StyleBop
Converse
Rm By Roland Mouret
Good. keep hiking it up.
1I'm so glad I quit smoking a few months ago.
CG - you're avi makes me sad. The actor who played Lorne died of heart disease at 33 this week. (His name escapes me. I'm so bad with names.)
2I know Star, and I am in mourning for real. I met Andy Hallet on a slayercruise and at a couple of Buffy Conventions (Yes i am that dorky) He was an amazing man. So talented.
3Very good thing.
I read somewhere that 20,000 adult new yorkers are supposed to quit beause of this increase. Whatever works!
4I'm glad I'm not a smoker!
5I'm glad I'm just a drinker.
6So much for free will.
7What's next?
LOL Piper23!
8Wow, and I always thought smoking in Germany was pricey. I live in an El Dorado for smokers...
9UnDave...everyone still has free will, no one is telling them not to smoke, its not like coke is cheap either..its just more expensive to slowly die!
10The government is doing everything they can to make smoking so expensive you have to make a choice, eat or smoke. That's not their job to tax something into non-existance. If tey want to stop everyone, make it illegal. We know how well that works with other drugs.
11(OK, last sentence is sarcasm)
Im surprised at your stance here Undave. You are always mr. personal responsibility.
12I think I still am. I don't think the government should be trying to tax smoking out of existance. I also recognize that the war on drugs isn't actually working. Something needs to be changed strategically.
13Yowza. Thank god I'd rather ruin my liver than my lungs!
14They're trying to pass it through the senate today that cigarette smoking should be through doctor-prescription only. (I can't imagine going to the doc and asking them to prescribe me cigarette LOL because it'll be great for me)
Hey, I think it's a good test to see if the government wants us to be healthier or if they just want to see more tax revenue from the cigarette sales.
15I have recently quit (for reasons unrelated to the economy and taxes) and I honestly think the tax hike on cigarettes is ridiculous. I hate that they are picking on people because I feel like they have chosen a habit that is detrimental to their health. Why don't they raise alcohol taxes? Alcohol is bad for your liver, among other things, and can also be addictive. Why not slap a tax on a Big Mac or a Whopper?
16Okay I made a typo - Second sentence should read, "I hate it because I feel like they are picking on people that have chosen a habit that is detrimental to their health."
17dave, I just expected your response to be something along the lines of oh well, if smokers have a problem with the cost, they can just quit. They made the choice to smoke in the first place. I am actually on the fence here. I mean I do think cigarettes are a terrible habit and support anything that encourages people to quit, but raising the price doesn't do that, people are still addicted and like any other drug will pay whatever it costs to get it.
18How is it not being " mr. personal responsibility" to say that instead of the nanny-state feds hiking up taxes, people are responsible on their own for whether they smoke. The government is taxing cigarettes because they're bad for you. What's next, a tax for when I clean my ears with q-tips? A tax on watching reality tv?
19My Dad is actually trying to quit because of this
. Yeah I just can't feel bad about
this, my asthma is saying this is a win win situation for all.
20I want to see taxes like this on Alcohol. I want to see taxes like this on fast food. I want to see taxes like this on EVERYTHING that a few enjoy but isn't good for them.
It's absolutely and utterly ridiculous that smokers are singled out.
21clarabelle98 and Modus Vivendi - That is EXACTLY how I feel about this, you worded it much better than I.
22Drinking alcohol in moderation doesn't have the adverse impact on health that moderate smoking does.
23This is like saying that if you drive an SUV, YOUR cost of gas is 35 cents per gallon HIGHER than everyone elses because your vehicle puts more emissions into the air.
Or, if you have a child and use disposable diapers your property taxes will go up because you make more waste than your neighbor without kids.
Or, if you don't drive you will pay higher federal taxes because you walk on the country's sidewalks more and thus contribute more to them breaking down.
All of those are ridiculous taxes, but if they're going to put yet ANOTHER one on cigarettes, then they need to tax everything else too.
1 month ago you could pick up a pack of cigarettes for 3.95. Now, they are 7.23. Has anything else in history every increased that much that fast?
24Something's messed up about this tax, and some people can't see that because it's popular to demonize tobacco in American culture. There are better places that money could have come from. For instance, do we really need to spend millions (or was it billions?) of our money to make sure everyone can watch TV? Wasteful.
25It's about the motives to me. If it's all about wanting Americans to be healthy then I'm okay with them increasing the tax, but then they should also be lowering the price of the stop smoking patches/gum so that people have an "out". "Forcing" someones hand thru monetary measures isn't always the best way, since cigarettes are a drug and highly addictive I can see in increase in crime behind thing....i.e. people stealing them, people selling them illegally ( unregulated) etc etc. And I do agree where does the stop..then we should have a higher tax on foods with transfats or foods that are high in cholesterol etc etc
26Moderately drinking alcohol and driving is more harmful than smoking a ciggy, and alcohol is much more releative to the individual than cigs are. And even if you only have one drink a day the effect of alcohol (even a moderate amount )on the brain is real and noted.
27It is singling out a population which is wrong. It is not about health, it is about making money. I hate smoking and being around it but do think it is an unfair tax hike.
28laurelm, clarabelle, Modus said it very well. I disagree with any tax hike involving just a certain group.
29And it is about the money. If the government really 'cares' about the health of these smokers and people around them, how about just ban cigarettes altogether, or pass the bill today on the senate, the one that requires a doctor's prescription to smoke a cigarette.
Bastyle - yes drinking and driving can be harmful, but that's combining two things. Smoking can have health repercussions for people near the smoker, regardless of the smoker's behavior or actions. The average moderate drinker's behavior is not likely to change in a way that negatively impacts on people around them - and the act of their drinking won't affect others.
30Studies have found benefits and repercussions from moderate drinking - but not on the scale that even moderate smoking can cause.
A ban on cigarettes would cause a bigger uproar than the tax.
31Well smokers could protest this and try and have the tax forced out...but they can't because they're smokers therefore forced to pay any price because of their addiction. They are victims of their addiction, not the government or popular opinion
. If they want to have the tax
dropped let them take action and personal responsibility for it.
If it were soda or fatty foods I bet your ass people wouldn't pay the price until the tax was removed or lowered. I don't even think alcoholics make up the majority of alcohol purchases...but don't quote me I could be wrong.
32Nothing like paying for cancer...
33Wow, the largest tobacco tax increase.Smoking shouldn't be in anyones lunch break plan or daily hobbies for a while ,but now they have increased the rate of tobacco we can breath in a little fresher air, Now im hoping and praying cancer will decrease from smoking and second hand smoking will decrease.I just thank god they have found a way to decrease people given their self and others cancer,lord knows how to make you stop doing something one way or another. m,w,f 9-950mapp.j.robin.
34So I haven't read through all of the responses, but this is a very good thing. Smoking is a personal choice, but it effects every tax payer in this country through higher health care costs. It causes 80% of lung cancer cases, it increases the risk of heart disease and stroke and high blood pressure. I don't have them on hand, but there are statistics from states that demonstrate raising tobacco taxes lead to lower health care costs.
They can't just ban cigarettes, it would never get through Congress. The tobacco lobby still has power, and it would so negatively impact tobacco producing states that the representatives (both Dem and Rep) from those states would never let something like that happen.
35I don't understand how me smoking in my car, or in my home affects anyone else but myself (Actually, I smoke on my back patio so my cat doesn't get 2nd hand smoke) Anyway, the point is, how often are non smokers forced to stand around people smoking? Raising the taxes and the price of cigarettes wont make everyone quit. It's a drug, and an addiction. It's just going to make people more desperate and make them more poor. Granted, it's a choice they make, but this tax isn't because the government cares about out health, it's because the government wants money, and it's easy for non smokers to justify this tax increase because it doesn't effect them.
36I'm sure if I let myself think about the tax on it's own, I could find things to object to, but I am happy that is an excise tax or whatever and is going to children's healthcare. Also, I am sure the an all out ban would be impossible since scientific ethics keep scientists from out and out proving the link between smoking and lung cancer so the tobacco industry keeps getting around anything that would make it ban-able if you will.
Ultimately, I am choosing to see the good that can come from this.
37OMG I'm so tired of ppl b*tching about second hand smoke HA HA! Which I'm sure all of you ppl complaining about second hand smoke, Drive a car RIGHT? Well most of you do. You ppl wake-up everyday and breathe in just like all the rest of us do. But you don't walk up to ppl driving cars and say please turn off your car, I can't breathe. MMMMMMM Whats worse standing next to a smoker in a room, or standing in a room with a CAR running? I'm not the smartest person in the world, nor do I claim to beee!!! It's my choice to smoke, we're all dying. Look at LA.Ca. with the smog, Do they have the right to complain about smokers. Next time you second hand smoke b*tchers want to b*tch, well turn your cars off or go to the factory puffing out who knows what kind of pollution into the air and tell them to stop! to make you feel better, Now stick your lips over the tailpipe of the NUMBER one polluter, the cars most of you (smoke complainers) drive, and breathe in DEEP!!!!! Think you don't pollute? turn on another light, that pollutes, by burning coal, write a letter (on paper) to a friend, that uses trees that cleans our air, Go to Target or Kmart and buy, buy anything. How do you think the product got there? By truck, that puffs out hydrocarbons, that's pollution. Oh yea the extra tax is going to help children's health, just like the lottery is helping mmmmmmm our schools, if you believe that I have some swamp land for sale!!!! I could go on and on here, if I haven't already, but I need to finish my cigarette, it's time for my breathing treatment, I have asthma, that I'm sure I got from breathing asbestosis, from years of doing brake jobs on cars, which been pumping brake dust into the air for years, from trillion of cars!!!!!!
38I agree rdrac. The smog is far worse than 2nd hand cigarette smoke. I just can't believe that people are still willing to pay $7 for a pack of cigarettes, that have been proven to cause cancer. In my opinion, it's to each their own. Eveyone has their own vice...
39I agree rdrac. The smog is far worse than 2nd hand cigarette smoke. I just can't believe that people are still willing to pay $7 for a pack of cigarettes, that have been proven to cause cancer. In my opinion, it's to each their own. Eveyone has their own vice...
40I agree rdrac. The smog is far worse than 2nd hand cigarette smoke. I just can't believe that people are still willing to pay $7 for a pack of cigarettes, that have been proven to cause cancer. In my opinion, it's to each their own. Eveyone has their own vice...
41Can I say WOW! Sorry for the triple post. My co-workers were talking to me...
42Can I say WOW! Sorry for the triple post. My co-workers were talking to me...
43Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.