If I was him I wouldnt wait either to get the heck out of town and away from all the stress.

It's not like he's working real hard leading us: he can go now.

Don't let the door hit ya in the ass on the way out.

we dont want him here in texas

I can't blame him for wanting to get the heck out. I'd be on the first flight out too.

I think he is working very hard myself, but then again I know where to look at his schedule, and what he does everyday.

Wow, really? Well that would be helpful information to know what the Presidents doing at all time- but a real security risk...

Besides, he'll be in Crawford. I'll be too close for comfort in Lubbock...

Mina, Wow really you can look on his website and see his schedule, and what he has done policy wise, etc. its really neat and keen.

I can only hope his excitement of leaving is on par with my exuberance at seeing him Go!

It only took 8 years..

I don't blame him - Id be running as fast as I can. He already checked out of the job years ago.

buh-bye!

With all the lockdown going on in DC, I'd be leaving Before the innaugeration.

I don't blame him for wanting to leave as fast as possible. After 7+ years of keeping our country safe from terrorist attacks, I'm sure he can't wait to be done. Especially when it appears that the majority of Americans are completely ungrateful to him for doing so.

Reminds me again of the joke about the guy in the suburbs, with the elephant gun...

Pink, I didn't know you spoke for Texas. But I, as a Texan, will be pleased to have him home and out of the White House.

steph, the joke is that there are no elephants in the suburbs, so the elephant gun becomes superfluous, even though the guy thinks that he is making a difference. It's funny because there are no elephants in the suburbs, just like there are no terrorists in America.

"But I, as a Texan, will be pleased to have him home and out of the White House."

Org: superficial, but it works, thanks.

I imagine he'll be quite pleased to go.

come on all, get in your last minute attacks. what will you live for when he is out of office? I think all of the witless, rude comments will just swell up in your head, and it may explode. I'd be careful if I were you!

Don't worry, Hain. I have a feeling we will know exactly where to direct our witless and rude comments.

...bloated anger is the new sexy!

Aw, now, you can criticize George Bush all day long (seriously, you could) but I don't think not working hard is fair. I mean, he is working a lot harder than I think he expected to.

You know, I've noticed that there are a lot more preemptive cheap shots against people assumed to be making cheap shots against Bush, than there are actual cheap shots against Bush.

Well, you gotta get those preemptive cheap shots against assumed cheap shots in at the last minute, Jude.

Very true, em.

"what will you live for when he is out of office?"

My bf, friends, family, music, the hope of a new America, really good food, concerts, the next Ewan McGregor movie, cute dogs, UT football, White Sox baseball, that bada$$-lookin' Johnny Depp/Christian Bale movie...lots of things, really.

I never realized I was supposed to be organizing my life around ridiculing Bush.

I guess I could set aside a half an hour a day for the next 11 days in order to criticize him.

Preemptive shots are a key part of the Bush Doctrine.
I'll volunteer to criticize Bush the first 11 days after the inauguration - when we start finding out how much we didn't know about the messes he made.

Why should liberal criticism of Bush end when his time as President does when conservative criticism of Clinton keeps gushing?

We'll still be broke, we'll still have two wars, we'll still have secret prisons around the world, we'll still have wiretaps on Americans... Clinton's blowjob had no where near the reach of Bush's sins.

"what will you live for when he is out of office?"

Bacon

"Preemptive shots are a key part of the Bush Doctrine."
that may the first time I've laughed on here in a while... not because I don't agree or trying to be argumentative. I thought it was rather witty of you Steph.

I was just referencing that every post that is about Bush, regardless of the topic is an excuse for a lot of you to make nasty comments. I guess same goes for Palin- oh just go back to texas/alaska to you hickville with mooses and cowboy hats and guns. I mean really, why do you have to let the immature comments come out? Speak about the actual issues at hand.
And i don't see any comments about the clintons on threads. See post about say Clinton meeting with all of the presidents...

any comments about clinton--- hmm nope, wait maybe about a rug... but not really bad, let's see the ones against W...

-Look, people, 4 wizards and Dobby in the center ! (Dobby has always been a little slow in my mind, so it fits)
So, it's good. The smart guys outnumber the dumb one
-Junior can't stop rocking on his feet or do something constructive with his hands long enough to take a picture? I keep waiting for a follow-up photo showing his knuckles dragging on the floor.

I posted a comment, it was flagged... don't know why. But I don't see Clinton getting the kind of comments of sugar sites as Bush does. Come one, there is no comparison there and you know it. Grabbing for straws much??

Well now, if we are going to go for who has the best reach, I was under the impression that your arms were far longer than mine.

umm... ok. no farther reach then trying to compare the hatred Bush receives on Sugar sites to the supposed hatred Clinton receives. but sure.

Yeah, but Citizen isn't the only political website on the Interwebs.

Jude, I was going to say that, but perhaps it is for some

1) Thank you Hainan, very nice of you to say that.
2) Undave ALWAYS brings up Clinton, always. As does Haus. GS regularly references him. According to them, Clinton is responsible for today's economy, 9/11, and the downward slid of American society... Hillary Clinton regularly is abused by conservatives here. And neither of them started two wars, opened secret prisons or wiretapped Americans.
This victim rap conservatives are revving up isn't working.

I have read many many jabs at Clinton about his extramarital action here on the Sugar network. (not to mention all of the insults aimed at HC for sticking with him)

I can see someone saying things about Bush when it is in reference to the actual topic, but you know people do make big jabs at Bush every chance they get. Where is is not so much for Clinton.
And isn't it funny, when referencing opinion about a topic, on this thread Tiabia thinks that we should speak of all the internet... where as in the polygamy thread, it is ONLY about sugar sites... I get it now. We will go by her rules...

Look Hain, didn't you know my name is Tiabia SUGAR...this is my world now play by my rules or Vamoose!!!

OK tiabiasugar. I bow down to thy rules.
now really, let's start fresh. I need no more enemies.

Hain you didn't get the "Tia's guide to SugarLand" handbook when you joined?

I did Sarah, I must have forgotten the line "follow tiabia's rules or vamoose"
Tiabia- oh great boss lady-

You're learning new emoticons, so that's a start

trying, I cheat... a lot!

with that said, I'm off for the weekend, have a lovely weekend ladies...