The Democratic National Convention, and the Obama-bump that followed, may seem far in the past, but the event will surely live on in history. I got a chance to ask a few questions to Mark Squier, an executive producer of the extremely successful (and fun) Democratic National Convention. When he's not coordinating massive political pageantry, Mark masters smaller-scale political messaging. He has produced ads for numerous members of Congress and governors, and acts as a strategic adviser to many more politicians. Now that the dust of both conventions has settled, take a behind-the-scenes look at the DNC with Mark!
On a scale of 1 to 10 how happy are you with how the DNC turned out?
10 being the highest — a 9. Nothing is ever perfect but this was close. When you consider we had a late primary so we didn't get guidance from a nominee until June — and we had two venues. We didn't have a major malfunction. You have to be happy with the way it turned out. And a shout out to everyone who worked at the Denver convention — the team that was put together was outstanding and it was easy to look good when you had such a committed and hardworking team in your corner. Oh — and not to mention Barack Obama — an incredible candidate to work with in every way.
How do you explain viewership that beat even the Olympics Opening Ceremony?
Americans are worried — it's human nature — they know things are on the wrong track; the wars, the economy, gas prices, health care costs, high unemployment, the national debt, the mortgage crisis. Voters feel these things every day and they know that this election is critically important to getting our nation back on track — so they watch.
To find out if Mark would have done something differently if Hillary Clinton would have won the nomination, how he kept the convention from looking like C-Span, what he thought of the RNC, and if there were any close calls with disaster, read more.
How do you keep the convention from looking like C-Span?
By using the best of all technologies. Television is a great amplifier of communications but it is not interactive. The Internet and all the new technology tools are great for making people feel connected — but it can't compete with the visual spectacle of Thursday night at Invesco field with 80,000 people on television. Using them both — TV to entice and the new technologies to connect — we think really helped get voters to be more involved and take a stake in electing their office holders and their democracy.
You began working on the convention before the Democrats chose Barack Obama. How did the message, or your approach, change once he became the presumptive nominee?
Not a lot. Change has been the message and theme really since Democrats were elected to the majorities in the House and Senate in 2006. In fact, you can see that McCain himself has now gone from arguing experience to trying to be an agent of change with his pick of Governor Palin for VP. Voters are angry — they think the country is off on the wrong track — they want change.
What was the closest call with disaster backstage that the viewers at home had no idea about?
Not telling — but there were a couple.
How do you think the RNC went?
Well. The Palin pick for VP created a lot of curiosity and that drives viewership.









Pieces
Ajc
Bunny Hug
I'd have to say from a theatrical standpoint it was a flawless show. It had a nice arc to it. Each presenter got everyone a little more excited than the last. Everyone looked great, sounded great, and there were very few embarrassing moments.
1Each speaker was engaging -- I loved watching DNC 08 -- and I totally want it on dvd -- that was one for the history books.
2i give it a ten
3It was a well-coordinated political spectacle that did exactly what it needed to do, but I'm now looking forward to the substance of the general election.
4I will say the DNC was better produced, but the RNC had better substance.
5I am still waiting to hear some of the substance!
6Well, obviously it's a partisan issue. If you're a republican you heard rhetorical substance that those who are democrats would find insubstantial. The same way when I hear Obama speak of "change" and "hope" I hear "fluff" and "clouds of wonder". If you really wanted to hear McCain's substance it's all there in his speeches about his tax plan, his foreign policy strategy and his domestic agenda. You may not agree with them, but they are quite substantial.
7Thank you for the explanation. I feel the same way when McCain recounts is POW experiences.
8The RNC Substance:
- Bridge to no where support = half truth.
- Ebay plane sold on eBay = no it wasn't
- Obama bashing = *yawn BORING - to be expected
- GOP using Heart music - finding out that it supports the Obama Camp = HA! Thank you John McCain
- Pitbull with lipstick = cute
- No talks about economy, health care, jobs, middle class, prosperity = figures they never talk about that
Sounds like a Jerry Springer show.
9If that's what you call substance -- I can see your point. Just sayin.
Seem like McCain/Palin -- like change now -- interesting.
10In their speeches over the weekend and early this week they are saying the EXACT same thing they said at the convention. I am ready to hear what they are going to do to make the next for years better. I don't give two sh*ts about hockey moms!! I need to hear some issues!!!
11Dream, Palin said she put the plane on ebay. She did not say that she sold it on ebay.
12She sure wants people to think she sold on ebay or she would not have brought it up.
13She it implied that that it sold on eBay.
"I put it on eBay" implies that it sold or that she got rid of it in a progressive way. When all she did was hire some one to sell it for her and it sold at a loss -- and is in litigation -- which I'm sure is costing tax payers money.
14And also:
"If our state wanted to build a bridge, we were going to build it ourselves." Watch an ex-aide defend Palin's position on the bridge »
The line gets big applause when she repeats it on the campaign trail, but Palin was for the bridge before she became governor. After being elected, she was against it, saying the project was too expensive, but Alaska kept the more than $100 million Congress gave for the bridge.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/09/palin.budget/index.html
15You can interpret what she said all day long but she never said she sold it. And I don't understand how a Governor changing their mind about a bridge that got too expensive is a bad thing.
16DNC-
McCain Bashing-yawn boring (insert emoticon here)
Chanting "8 is enough" annoying
Bash Bush-expected and old
Tells us about "change" doesnt tell us exactly how. (end dependence in 10 years on oil dependence from middle east, raising teachers saleries, protect SSI, 150 billion in renewable resources etc...how, and how much?)
Resorts to age old sayings "bootstraps" =lame
"dont tell me that the democrats wont keep us safe..." also lame
BUT again, it all depends on what camp you are from.
17Changes resonates well - Palin's words and now their new campaign direction. You know you're on to something when the other side takes it as their own.
18I agree. Have you seen the polls lately? McCain is either ahead or dead even with Obama, depending on which poll you look at. Now that is change!
19So the word "change" and the meaning of that word, is now soley in the possession of the Democratic party , in particular Obama's only to use?
What are most campaigns about? changing the bad things in washington, our nation, looking for change in the future, changing current policies...what on earth is McCain and Palin supposed to say instead?
Can they use:
Alter
Modify
Transform
Adjust
Amend
revolutionize
which one is okay with the word police?
20And since McCain has been in washington longer, and probably used that word long before barry, he should have first dibs
(lord baby jesus I am in middle school now, "thats our word not yours" "copy cat")
21When someone basis their entire campaine on a word and they make it their slogan it is a little undremining to start using it as your own. Didn't the GOP call John Kerry a flip flopper for doing the EXACT same thing that McCain is doing now?
22campaign sorry
23Touchy
24And combined Obama/Biden have been in Washington -- longer than McCain/Palin. Same old talking points -- but it's true -- nothing to get mad over.
25I'm not mad, I agreed with you about change resonating well. It seems to be working for us a little bit more at the moment, that's all I'm saying. I don't think CG is mad either. She's doing the exact same thing you guys were doing a few posts up - mocking the candidate. Surely you guys don't have the market on mocking the candidates like you do "change".
26I thought Obamas slogan was "yes we can" its also "change?" can he have two? what about "8 is enough" thats three, but thats not his platform, change is right?
so note to McCain, must run the rest of your campaign without any direction towards Change, or using the word. because that makes you unoriginal FYI.
27I am not mad. I just want a change..oops. sorry my bad....i want to transmogrify.
28And here we go....
29If want change the McCain is deffinalty your man!!
30Did anyone hear Hillary's comment yesterday about returning Republicans to the White House "is like asking the iceberg to save the Titanic." Love that!
Having Republicans in the White House again, to me is the opposite of "change".
31Change and McCain -- just don't fit. But Same and McCain do.
I love that quote from Hill.
32I never heard that quote from Hil but that is really hilarious. I am SO using that to piss off my conservative friends hahaha.
33Hell YEAH I heard that! And I laughed my ass off!
Personally, I find it interesting that the McPalin ticket's version of "change" is more "I changed my mind about that & I'm going to continuously lie about it" rather than actual substantial changes in policy.
And why, exactly, is a campaign limited to one slogan? Is it in the fine print of the McCain-Fiengold campaign finance bill?
34I heard the quote and I thought it was great and also very true!
35How many slogans should Obama have?
36I loved the DNC, it was a nice representation of America (not just elderly white people and cowboys with sprinklings of black folk) and if you're saying we had lame chants (I think Drill Baby Drill, is completely ridiculous). The RNC was nothing but bashing Obama/community organizers, blatant lies, and scaring tactics.
37Homes hadn't been foreclosed this much since the Great Depression. The unemployment rate is at an all-time high, and the Repubes haven't said anything of substance yet about how they're going to solve these and other problems. I guess whoever is in favor of mccain/palin are very happy with the way the country is being mismanaged now.
38Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.