- France: Bonjour, Barack? Obama talks Iran with President Sarkozy. —Huffington Post
- Oil Spill: New perspective on offshore drilling? Old-fashioned accident just occurred on the Mississippi River; one leaking barge spread a slick down 100 miles of the river. — Dot Earth
- Military: Does this clear things up? Pentagon confirms that it told Obama he couldn't visit Army base with campaign staff. – Talking Points Memo
- VP: Coming soon? McCain will most likely chose VP before Olympics. — Townhall
- Torture: Is torture the new "is?" Bush administration created new definition of torture. —Doklephant










Woodhouse Clothing
Best Mountain
Kenneth Jay Lane
Imagine that torture definition being used to harm someone you love. The meaning of torture becomes clear quickly when it's personal.
1If McCain gets elected, there will be more oil drilling and leaks and slicks along our coasts.
2And guess which company deals with leak detection???
Of course, Halliburton. $$$$$
http://www.halliburton.com/ps/Default.aspx?navid=50&pageid=127&prodgrpid...
How does a tanker spill have anything to do with off-shore drilling? Two boats can collide that are bringing imported oil.
3More drilling, more boats, more opportunity for spills, leaks and slicks.
4But as our demand grows, there is going to be more boats, more opportunity for spills, etc. Drilling closer to home would mean that the boats travel a smaller distance, therefore are not on the seas as much, and therefore have less chance of colliding with anything.
5Solar panels don't spill and wind doesn't leave slicks.
6Why leave the environment to chance?
Solar panels won't propel my car. There has not been an electric car yet that performs as well as a gasoline powered engine. I look forward to seeing progress in alternative fuels, but corn isn't the answer for our biofuels.
7An electric car can get you where you're going - if it's your car's performance vs. our environment, I think your car draws the short straw.
8What I don't understand in the claims that McCain=oil spills. It is such a vague and ambiguous statement without any proof. It is like me saying because my students turned 16 this year, they are going to be killing everyone on the road because they are young and driving.
9I agree with the theory Stephley, but my car is my family's livelihood. Take that away and you condem my family. I'm sure I can do other things, but I won't make the kind of money I'm making at what I'm doing. Create a kind of car that does the same thing as my gas-powered auto, and doesn't cost 6 figures, and I'll consider buying it.
10Sometimes Dave, I think it all boils down to resistance to change with you. You just don't like it!
11It could be that too.
I also know that my job as a salesman is not a secure career.
Recently, my boss's boss's boss was fired for not making his numbers. He had a $10,000,000 goal, and he only brought in $9,900,000. I have enough to worry about without someone else mandating
that I change cars to something that will hinder my ability to do my job.
12Good analogy, hunter!
And Dave, I totally see where you're coming from. I don't think saying, "I need my gasoline-powered car right now to survive," and saying, "I support the development of new technologies so I won't need my gasoline-powered car in the future," are mutually exclusive.
13Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.