I hesitated for a moment before writing up this poll. (Yes, even I can blush!) But I figured, if dudes feel totally free examining every inch of a woman's body, what's stopping me? Nothin'. For the record, I don't care if it's all real. David Beckham is a Greek God in my eyes, codpiece or no. (I mean look at those abs!) But the Daily Mail has posted the following side-by-side of Becks at the beach and in his Armani ad, and something doesn't add up. They suspect "airbrushers have pumped up his lunchbox." Well, what do you think? Is David Beckham's suspicious package stuffed or au naturale?
Featured
David Beckham's Suspicious Package: Stuffed or Au Naturale?
1 Person Likes This Please login or register to like this
UrbanBohemian30 Comments Post a Comment
More on TresSugar
Fall Award Season
Top Brands
Temperley London
Elle Passions
Polo Ralph Lauren
Who cares? He's hot, and it's not like there's a chance in hell with him anyway!
1I don't care since I don't find him appealing anyway, but is the second picture actually him?
2I think he is definitely au naturale!
This photo of him shows that he is heavily hung and it is the REAL thing.
http://img138.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=65711_speedos_122_965lo.jpg
3Who cares - he's still yummy. Women can wear padded bras, why can't men wear padded underwear?
4In the other ad where he is reclining, it looks like he is (ahem) "aroused" - I say it is definite airbrushing. So much press has been given about how "well-endowed" this dude is - come on, you know that old saying, if's it's true, those who have it, don't need to brag about it (or something along that line).
When ads are done, a lot of work goes into air brushing the final photo - likewise before the shoot, I'm sure they tan his stomach just so it looks more defined.
Things in magazines never look the same in real life and I'm sure that goes for his so-called "package"
Sorry to sound negative but that's reality....
5Those undies he is wearing in the first pic are made were they make a guy look like they have this huge packages. I don't think it is airbrushed I think it is the cut of the undies.
6That’s deceiving! lol thats so wrong. NO STUFFING THE GOODS!
7Also, I agree with Amethyst...I think they get the guy's blood 'flowin' before the pic is taken to give things a plumbed up look.
8I'm never going to get with him, so I don't care either way. You can tell when women's boobs are enhanced in magazines anyway. It's all smoke and mirrors.
9I think he looks sexy stuffed or not.
10I have seen paparazzi photos (taken illegally) of David (standing and reclining) in which his package looks virtually the same as in the recently released Armani pictures......in fact, the British tabloids have these photos and know of them but it is illegal to publish them......
11I don't think it's stuffed, I think maybe they just kind of jacked everything into the front like when we "fluff" our boobs.
12He might have some shrinky dink in the second pic from going swimming.
Not that I care
either way.
13I don't think it really matters...plus what Armani was looking for with these pictures is publicity for his underwear collection and sure he is getting it
14I'm going with who cares...dudes friggin hot, and I have no shot!!!
@ Giggle...now those are poll "remarks" that I agree with 100%!!!
15I got my BF a pair of boxers that make his already humongous package look gargantuan. YUM YUM. So maybe that's what it is - or maybe it's smaller in the second pic because he just got back from a dive in the cold cold cold shrinky ocean.
16i don't even think the 2nd picture is him..sure it's the same tatts but THAT could be airbrushed...just sayin.
17I dont really care how big it is when its just chilling... some of us fill em out a little more than others naturally...
18yeah, it's really hard to tell in the second picture, I surely did not recognize him and I really can't see any similarities in the face either.. As for the size of his package, well He's hot no matter what.
19It's a different style of underwear and let's not forget the male penis is different in size and shape depending on temperature, time of the day etc! I think the Daily 'Hate' Mail have ignored the laws of biology!
And actually I have seen pictures of him in underwear and speedos where he is bulging prominently from Summer vacation in 2004 and last Summer. It's just choosing a picture for convenient story making.
20I started at for quite some time the other. I'd like to thing its real.
21It's so fake!
22Listen to you people.
23they're complete different pics and the other one is in black and white so corse it is going to accentuate his muscles, he is sexy as hel anyway so who cares, yum!
24Fashion photographers go to various lengths to get the 'money' shot, think hot hairdryer, for example...They know that a penis can turn from a peanut to a sausage, something the Daily Mail wants to not believe in the name of a silly story.
Funny how they didn't choose the pix below.
25http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/3795/untitlethghfhhgdkz6.png
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/1238/66769090vu3.png
who cares? he'll still be THE sexiest man alive.
26dont think the second pic is him...anyway love him UNCONDITIONALLY!
27im with penny!
28man candy..eye candy...who cares!! he's just hot and i just like looking at him either in the ad or in regular pic with his boys and wife! YUMMY!
29i think it's au natural!!!
he has pics who poves that!!!
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_rxMrZ46CrAY/RpgXf79GU2I/AAAAAAAAGog/o_VS2lCbOB...
look at that!!!
IT'S BETTER ON THIS PHOTO THAN ON THE ADD!!!
30Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.