Three recent upsets in special elections for US House of Representative seats in the deep South, have Democrats rethinking their political fortunes in the region. In 1964, President Lyndon Johnson famously said: "There goes the South for a generation" as he signed the Civil Rights Act. But recent and unlikely victories mean it might be time for the Democrats to draw a new map.
Alabama Pollster John Anzalone told the AP:
The Republican brand has taken a hit. When you have economic anxieties, the wedge issues that Republicans use just aren't that important. People aren't fat and happy now. They're worried.
This sounds like a more-nuanced incarnation of Barack Obama's bitter-gate comments.
Another factor helping the Democrats is the fact that candidates are not shy about embracing "values issues" co-opted by the Republicans. Southern voters find pro-life, pro-gun, and anti-gay marriage candidates, running on a Democratic ticket. What makes these candidates different from the Republicans? They do not accept Republican foreign or economic policy, nor do they carry George W. Bush's baggage.
Are the Spring's special election upsets a signal that the Democrats are going to widen their congressional majority this fall. If the incoming Democrats have a lot of red in their platform, what kind of majority will this be? Are Democrats giving up their core values, or finally understanding their constituency, and thus what it takes to win?









Nine West
Sebastian
Sergio Rossi
"Southern voters find pro-life, pro-gun, and anti-gay marriage candidates, running on a Democratic ticket."
Could you name a few of those people, because I can't think of any....
1Not trying to be argumentative, I just really can't think of any off the top of my head!
2Maybe if the Demos are putting some red into their platform, they will be team purple.
3That was my unsuccessful attempt at a purple smiley face.
4Hey cabaker,
5Mississippi's Childers
"Anti-abortion and pro-gun rights, Childers was able to convince voters that he would represent their values"
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2008/05/democrats_win_mi...
He is on team purple.
Thanks J! I'll look more into that!
6The closest thing to republican on the democrats side is Hillary Clinton, and she stands for none of those things.
Odd article.
7Socially conservative, fiscally liberal...? What an interesting combination. I love to see this kind of thing. Politicians willing to step outside the party line seems like the closest thing to a multi-party system we're going to see in my lifetime.
P.S. Liberty - In that last sentence I think you wanted to say "core" values. I mean, I'm just assuming you didn't want to make the statement that Democrats have poor values...
8I think they should put the head of Ted Kennedy on the body of Dick Cheney. Not for any political reason, just to see what happens.
9Ted would just look a little slimmer, like 40 years ago.
10I think both parties are re-arranging themselves and people are finding a middle ground again.
The guy who won in La. was Cazoyoux and he was all those things cab. AND the only reason he beat a democrat was because he was running against a known racist and kkk friend... so not much of a victory, guys. sorry.
11Oops! Thanks Jen. Freudian slip?
12I cannot believe you just said "bitter-gate". Haha, can't we put the "n-Gate" thing to rest already?
13Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.