The golden state just got a gloomy forecast. Scientists predict that a strong and deadly earthquake will hit California within 30 years. The probability that the "big one" will be at least a 6.7 magnitude is now over 99 percent. An even more dangerous 7.5 magnitude is 46 percent likely, and more prone to Southern California.
Geophysicists hope city planners, building designers, insurance companies, and homeowners will use the information to plan ahead. Check out 72 Hours for some very useful tips on how to get ready for earthquakes, fires, severe storms, power outages, acts of terrorism, and any other imaginable emergency.
So, if you're planning to be in California in the next 30 years, you're going to need some bottled water and canned food! Do you worry about natural disasters where you live? Are you prepared?









Lanvin
2two
Tibi
This is nothing new. They have been saying the big one is coming for years.
1I also hear that it will rain sometime in the next year.
2they should make it happen in the next year so it will be Bushs fault somehow.
3East Coast for life
4I was born and raised in Cali so always prepped as much as I could be for an earthquake (water, food, sneakers under the bed). You are always under the shadow of the "Big One." Now that I don't live there I am always prepared for disasters as much as I can be since it has been instilled in me.
5earthquakes are part of life here, they don't scare me. maybe it's because my dad is a geotehnical engineer (plays with dirt & rocks for money). he took all the hocus pocus out of it for me when i was a kid. The thing I think is so funny is when people talk about "earthquake weather" - how on Earth does what's happening in the sky have anything to do with what's happening to the tectonic plates under our feet? With the possible exception of the aftermath of a quake/ volcanic eruption causing weather of one kind or another?
6haha skinnymarie. Same here! East Coast for LIFE!
7And the ICE AGE is returning in 25 years.
I'll believe it when I watch it on television (except I don't own one).
8I'm terrible. I've lived in SoCal for more than 10 years, and never really given much thought to earthquake preparedness. For some reason, the wildfires that raged down here last fall were a lot more alarming.
9I have always been afraid to move to Cali b/c of the earthquakes. I have a fear of getting trapped. I will take snow and ice any day.
10and that's why i've always loved living in D.C. - all we get are a few floods and the occasional snowstorms. we get all four seasons and things are pretty sweet.
however, the threat of an earthquake wouldn't stop me from living in Cali. i'd LOVE to live there someday.
11When I lived in Maryland we had a very minor earthquake that led to a flurry of stories about how pretty much every place is at risk. We also had a couple of minor tornadoes that surprised everyone in the years I was there. I keep trying to make an emergency kit but my kid keeps taking the bandaids and I end grabbing the canned food when I'm too lazy to go to the store.
12Nica-save lots of money before you come out here. As high as DC area prices are, it's worse out here, IMO.
13I've lived around Los Angeles most of my life and I've lived in the Bay Area for the past four and a half. I'm definitely prepared.
After seeing countless disaster movies were people beat the crap out of each other for the last bottle of water on the shelf I've decided it was prudent because I really don't want to hurt anyone.
14If it comes to fighting over food and water, I'm dead.
15In one earthquake years ago, one person was killed when a letter fell from a sign. That's the kind of thing that actually worries me.
This is one reason we should take the time to really educate ourselves on how to live in the wild. I would be more than happy to throw on my back pack and go live in the back country for a couple of months if I had to.
16I'd probably eat poison ivy on the first day out!
17Think I have yet another reason to reconsider our planned move to California. Canada is sounding better and better to me.
I guess I've dealt with my share of natural disasters here in South Florida. I've had to live without electricity and decent meals for a month or so... many times. But still... the idea of the ground moving beneath me scares me so much more than hurricanes.
18Yeah well you have a guide book just make sure you read the WHOLE page and pages are stuck together or you'll end up like baby boy from Into The Wild. Poor thing.
19"save lots of money before you come out here."
I second that, Stephley.
But maybe I'm just bitter because when I went to put gas in the car today, it was up to $3.99/gallon for regular.
20You know Jude you just reminded me of something and honestly I haven't thought about it in almost four years. I decided to give up owning a car in 2002 for one and I'll be honest economic reasons but two very close behind environmental reasons. I just realized how much money I was throwing away on what was a luxury for me not a necessity. After moving to the Bay Area I don't even miss having one and if I really need one I just rent from Zip car. They charge by the hour or day. Rented one for four hours on Sunday only cost me $20.
21I'm so envious of you, hypnotic. I would love to not own a car--I hate driving, and I hate spending money on gas and maintenance and stuff, not to mention the environmental impact. My commute is too long for San Diego public transport, unfortunately
The buses don't even go as far north
as I need.
22Yea, living with the fear of a looming earthquake is always in the back of my head and I, too, have been hearing "big one" stories my whole life. I lived in the Bay Area in 1989 when that one happened it was definitely scary.
23I've only felt small quakes, but so far, I'm much less afraid of them then I was of hurricanes. Hurricanes feel like so much rage for hours.
24I've visited L.A. once, but i've never been in an earthquake because i've lived in Florida my whole life. So, just hurricanes, floods, drought, wildfire and the occasional tornado for me!
25When I moved to LA, people asked me "Aren't you scared of earthquakes?" If the "big one" kills 72 people every 20 years out of 13 million people...the odds just aren't that terrifying.
My old state would have 300 tornados every year, and that was far more scary to me. Or the blizzards and deathly driving conditions. Or the floods where I needed the National Guard to bring me water when there was none.
I am more scared of traffic than earthquakes!
26i read about this earlier today and i think that it's really interesting to see how scientists are able to predict things like this. i was watching a show on discovery or something along those lines during the christmas holiday and they were talking about how you can try to predict things like this happening. i hope that they are able to fortell things like this happening before they do strike so that the damages and loss of life are minimal.
27I live in Oklahoma... tornadoes are my thing
28It gets BAD here. Look up the May 3, 1999 tornadoes!
About 66 tornadoes in Ok and surrounding areas... over 1 billion dollars of damage.
But to tell you the truth, since I've grown up here and have been around so many I'm not really scared of them anymore. I love thunderstorms and tornadic weather. I guess it just depends on what you grow up around.
Maybe it'll knock California into the ocean, and then they can be their own little country.
29San Fran better be making nice with the military. Sounds like they are going to need them.
30I don't see San Fran doing that. Somehow they'll manage to blame the current administration for any problems they have.
31Excellent point, UnDave. I hear Code Pink is a good group to call when you have a natural disaster. They string their boas together and people climb out of buildings using them. Smart and resourceful group, that one.
32Hi Everyone! San Francisco is definitely self-conscious of it's national identity.
Here is an insightful article on how SF's characterization as a bastion of the elite played into the whole Obama bitter-gate. If you stroll through the article's discussion, you'll find some authentic SF reaction to the whole issue.
... I'm sure some opinions will fit the stereotypes, and others might surprise you.
33I live on the New Madrid Fault line, a large region of seismic activity including parts of AR,IL,TN,MO,&KY. When I was in elementary school, a famous seismologist by the name of Brown predicted a huge earthquake on Dec 2 or 3rd of the year (maybe '92 or '93). He was very specific and sure of himself and as a result we had all this earthquake protection education, bolted down bookshelves, had to bring gallons of water to school, etc. it was hysteria, in some regards, because I guess we really thought it was going to be the big one. The big one has yet to happen in our area, but the threat still frightens me. . .
34OMG terryt18, I totally remember that!!! We had to do earthquake drills (in Illinois of all places!!!!)--it was so freakin' bizarre!
35For me I think it was grade school, though--so maybe '90 or '91? But it was definitely Brown and Dec. 2 or 3, so it was the same period/scare.
36Are these the same peeps that predict the weather?
37Nope, these guys are geologists, seismologists and geophysicists - not weather guys.
38Hey, Liberty, can you give us some insight into why San Francisco is so anti-military? Seriously. What has the military ever done to you guys? Just don't see what all the hostility is about. Can you explain?
39Hey there piper23. I hesitate to explain other people's opinions, as I am not anti-military.
I do know that there has been push back against city leaders when they peruse "anti-military" policy. For example, one city supervisor tried to cancel Fleet Week (the week when the city welcomes the Blue Angles and Navy). People got pretty upset, and Fleet Week went forward! Thousands of San Franciscans enjoyed the military traditions, and celebration. (It's one of my favorite weeks of the year!)
As for the JROTC, I know many people were upset when the School Board banned it, and of course many eager to provide high school students alternatives.
I think San Francisco is an easy target, because the city is a forum for vocal political minorities. Also many confuse anti-war sentiment with anti-military sentiment. But, I have never personally experienced hostility toward the troops, or anti-military attitudes.
Anyone else have a perspective?
40I was born and raised CA, never lived anywhere else. Earthquakes aren't that big of a deal to me. I like to be prepared, but nothing crazy. Like Jillness said, we have a "big" one not very often and yes unfortunately they often result in deaths, but there are worse natural disasters, that happen WAY more often and result in more deaths and damage. Our homes and buildings are built to withstand easrthquaks as much as possible. Hearst Castle (central Coast CA) was built in 1947 (that's when they stopped building) and it survived a 6.6 just a couple years back with no damage. That's pretty amazing. We don't use brick (usually, it's just facade if you see it) because it doesn't do well in earthquakes. I personally live right at the end of the San Andreas fault. I'm not too worried, just got to be ready.
41Thanks for the insight, Liberty. I have read the stories regarding the blockage of recruiters at high schools and colleges along with the JROTC fiasco. Also the USS Iowa issue was a hard one to understand as well. And I know that its not all of San Fran that is anti-military but unfortunately the rest of the country doesn't hear about the ones like you. Thanks again for the insight!
42Dude they've been saying this for the past 30 years as well!
43JudeC-- Yes! Same scare! I couldn't remember exactly what grade I was in, but my birthday is the 1st and I was seriously scared I was going to turn 10 or whatever and the next day the world would swallow me up.
Did you live in S. IL? I'm in W KY .
44terryt18--central IL. Decatur, to be exact.
That was such a weird thing, the Midwest earthquake scare. I haven't thought about it in years! Wonder what's become of Brown?
45We humans are sometimes awfully stupid.
We know an earthquake will happen, yet take a fatalistic viewpoint on it - until it DOES. Then we change our minds.
I hope Americans in earthquake zones would become more vividly aware of the very REAL dangers facing them, so fewer will die WHEN one occurs. As for me, you couldn't pay me enough to live in southern Calif., for that reason alone.
Yet I, too, live in an earthquake zone. And the worst part of it is that I know almost nothing about it. It could be a dire risk, or a very minimal one.
I live in Mexico, on a huge mountain plateau that covers a broad region of northern Mexico (it includes Guadalajara, and Lake Chapala - I live near the lake). This plateau is a MILE above sea level, and there are visible signs that big quakes have struck this area before, but I don't know how long ago. There are some road cuts where strata are severely bent, but is such activity likely again? In my 14 years here, I've already lived through two major quakes, but they were far away, and our area only swayed back and forth, no damage was done. But it could happen, and it worries me. Even those swaying movements were awesome - the sheer ENERGY required to send the waves 100-200 miles, and still be strong enough to make this whole plateau sway back and forth like a cork on a wave - lake, mountains, and much more - was mindblowing.
On top of this plateau, in a circle all around the Lake, there are mountains. On top of a mile-high plateau! One is visibly of volcanic origin; you can see its crater, but nobody knows when it last erupted. Some say the lake itself is a huge caldera that has been inactive for thousands of years. Some evidence exists that it may be so, because most of our groundwater is near the boiling point, indicating magma not far underground. We have a few fumaroles emitting gas, and a few geysers and hot springs, too. One of Mexico's active volcanoes, Colima, is about 55 miles S.E. of us, as the crow flies. Dust from its own eruptions covers this area and makes the dry season miserable, as breezes extract it from the soil every year and spread it all over - it gets into everything! Until the rainy season begins - which will be soon, thank goodness. We're dry as a bone here from about October thru June, then we get storms virtually every night - and occasionally in the day. Needless to say, everyone prefers rainy season. It cools things down - for real, not turning into steam - and scrubs the dust out of the air.
This climate, though, is about as perfect as you can get. I've never had A/C or central heat. A fan, or sweaters and an electric blanket are all I've ever needed. No high utility bills! Eat your heart out. Actually, tho, I wish you had what I have.
I have no source that can tell me about the geology of this region that I live in. My Spanish is adequate, but not good enough to understand science in that language.
In an area somewhat West of Zacatecas, I once saw a landscape so tortured by geologic upheavals that it looked like a frozen geologic SCREAM! This northwestern section of Mexico is highly active geologically, but I want to know HOW, what the factors and history, etc., really ARE. And the odds of something really NASTY striking this area.
Can someone help me find a source of solid information about this area? It's more than wanting to know the odds and be prepared; it's a towering sense of scientific curiosity, too. This area seems geologically unique, and I'm fascinated by geology.
And thanks to anyone who tries to satisfy my thirst for info.
Holly B.
46As an "armchair geologist," I must tell the people of S. California that they should check out the kind of soils their houses and workplaces sit on. If on or close to solid rock, it's best. If on thick soil, especially sediments or old landfill material, they'd do best to consider moving. Those soils literally turn into LIQUID in a quake, and the damage is astronomical - the death rate, too. If you live on thick, soft soil in those areas, get away from them, before it's too late. Because when a major quake hits, you'll be hit worst of all.
Also know what faults are involved with the places you spend time in. The San Andreas moves at an average of two inches a year. That doesn't sound like much. But between 1907 when the big San Francisco quake occurred, and now, 2" a year amounts to about 200 inches, or 5 and a half feet. To move all of it at once would be a gargantuan quake. I don't have info how much movement it has had in the S. F. area since 1907, but I think most of it has yet to move.
When a major fault builds up many years, not moving, the pressures become enormous. When it finally gives, it literally snaps, and the results are godawful for people.
PLEASE! Take these quakes very seriously. The day one happens to you is too late. I know a high death toll will be unavoidable in a major quake, but it hurts to think of even ONE of my fellow Americans dying. Shoot, it hurts to think of ANY human dying in any natural disaster.
And aren't we lucky we don't live in Myanmar? The regime there is an obscenity, a BLOT on humanity itself.
47Correction. Not 5 1/2 feet - 16 and a half feet. 5 1/2 YARDS. I divided the 200 inches by 36 instead of 12. Mea culpa. And 16 feet is an extremely large movement.
Stay safe, and stay ALIVE, okay?
48Anyone who thinks this information about the likelihood of a Calif. earthquake is hype or something doesn't know their science. Be ignorant, but not where it risks your life. I don't want anyone to die merely for being stupid.
This is NOT hype. It is very real indeed. Yes, hurricanes are terrifying, and so are floods and tornadoes, but at least you get SOME forewarning. A quake hits with none at all, and it hits HARD.
It isn't the earth that threatens you in a quake; it's what can FALL on you. Most often, the building you're in, but also power lines and walls from nearby structures. If a quake hits, just get out into the open where nothing around you can fall on you - if possible. The earth itself opens up and closes on people only in extremely rare situations. Figure out now, in advance, where you'd go, so you don't have to cogitate the matter later, when seconds count.
And the Midwest "earthquake scare" was no scare. The one that hit the Missippi and Ohio river valleys was one of the biggest in history. Hardly anyone lived there back then, so there was little damage or loss of life. But that quake was a great granddaddy. If it happened today, it'd be horrendous. And it WILL happen again. They're trying to figure out when it might happen right now. It's not an ordinary quake area, and is extremely complex, but VERY real. That doesn't mean you should pay attention to people who claim to actually predict a quake. No professional geologist would try to do that, because they know they can't. Listen to what the pros say about it. And take THEM seriously.
It's not a scare or hype, because I've known about this quake area since the '70's. Were they scaring people then, too?
Weather does not have any measurable effect on quakes, but geologic activity CAN at times affect weather. The ash Krakatoa put into the atmosphere affected weather for several years. Nothing yet can accurately predict a quake. But it can project the odds, which is what this article is doing. There is nothing better. I'd take them very seriously, even the dude who says his dad played with rocks for money.
mini_pixie should be ashamed for minimizing the dangers of earthquakes where they've come often and hard. Hocus pocus? What kind of geologist would call earthquake risks hocus pocus? They are real indeed, and we DO know where they're most likely to happen, too. We can make fairly reliable projections of how bad the next one is likely to be for a given fault, and even a range of years in which it is likely to happen. But the projections are too broad, too general, to be called predictions. You can only be prepared for one that is known to be "on its way some day." Especially if "some day" isn't all that far off. S. Calif. is due for a major quake. Within 30 years. Much more likely a lot sooner. Even tomorrow is not out of the question. S. Calif. quakes can happen ANY time, along ANY of its many faults. Any geologist who could say it's hocus pocus should turn in his seismographs.
If a major quake occurs, and you're THERE, you're in grave danger. If you expect to be THERE for the next 30 years, you WILL be hit with an earthquake. It's only a matter of where the rupture occurs and where you are in relation to it - and a few other factors, too. You can't know where you'll be, or anything else until it happens. But it WILL happen. Earth movements are very slow, very hard to predict, but never simply stop. The quakes are inevitable.
The fact that hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, etc., can sometimes result in more loss of life begs the question. It ignores the fact that at times earthquakes result in MORE. And for all other disasters, you always have at least SOME time to brace yourself. Even a volcano gives warnings. Not earthquakes. And if you're in a quake zone, what does it matter to your safety if a tornado in OK takes many lives? Does that mean a quake won't? Your problem in S. Calif. is earthquakes, wildfires and flooding, chum. The most deadly are the quakes.
If you are taking seriously any of the shrugoff comments here, I'd recommend you get a good book from the library about earthquakes, written at the layman's level (maybe a Time-Life book) and READ that puppy. Don't forget to eyeball the photos, either.
49hypnoticmix makes a good point. If we learned a bit about how to gather edible plants, we might be better able to survive many kinds of natural disasters. It only would involve learning about the kinds that grow in your area, and then learning all you can about them, so you can seek them out if you need to one day. Good show, hypnoticmix!
As for clean water, it's truly a pity you don't have what I have here in Mexico: purificaton drops. A drop in a quart of water kills ALL microbes in it. Mix in the drop well, wait 20 minutes and drink. Here in the tropics, intestinal parasites thrive in the soil, and get on ALL produce that grows near the soil. Cabbage will give you one for sure, as will celery, cilantro, lettuce or any other green leaf.
I can purify my produce easily. You can't. I don't have to care what e-coli are on my spinach. If I had my drops handy, I'd eat it raw. All that good spinach America has wasted! Over e-coli, which can be easily killed with purification!
Maybe it's time Americans started asking some pointed questions about things affecting their health that they CAN'T have. And trying to find out WHY they can't have things they could really use. I've even used 10 drops in a gulp of water to CURE a parasite when I got one - and it works. Fast and cheap, too.
These purification drops could also easily solve the problem of contaminated water after disasters around the world. Why doesn't this quick, cheap, lightweight (easily transported) solution get ANY press time? Why transport tons of HEAVY bottles of drinking water when they could transport little bottles the size of nasal sprays? Each can purify drinking water, from ANY source, for a LARGE family for a month. Easily. It doesn't take out anything; it just kills the buglies. But in a disaster, that's enough!
And, after 14 YEARS of using the drops regularly, I can assure you that they do precisely what they claim to do. And woe to me when I'm too hungry to purify my cole slaw. Every time, without fail, I got sick. I'm smarter now.
Mexico has had these drops for DECADES. Yet American "experts" say purifying food is difficult and "still being researched"! What baloney! You're being lied to, bigtime, on that one.
I've used them, successfully, for 14 years. So has the bulk of Mexico's population. They can be used on sores, like mercurichrome, on acne to kill the germs there - lots of uses.
But YOU can't have them. That stinks.
50Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.